From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2381 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2007 22:53:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 2365 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Dec 2007 22:53:50 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from miranda.se.axis.com (HELO miranda.se.axis.com) (193.13.178.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 22:53:46 +0000 Received: from ignucius.se.axis.com (ignucius.se.axis.com [10.83.5.18]) by miranda.se.axis.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) with ESMTP id lB4MrgQQ000600; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 23:53:42 +0100 Received: from ignucius.se.axis.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ignucius.se.axis.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Debian-2woody1) with ESMTP id lB4Mrgfm021443; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 23:53:42 +0100 Received: (from hp@localhost) by ignucius.se.axis.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Debian-2woody1) id lB4MrgZ9021439; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 23:53:42 +0100 Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 22:53:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200712042253.lB4MrgZ9021439@ignucius.se.axis.com> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson To: aldyh@redhat.com CC: hans-peter.nilsson@axis.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org In-reply-to: <20071204151926.GA28920@redhat.com> (message from Aldy Hernandez on Tue, 4 Dec 2007 11:19:26 -0400) Subject: Re: PR33713: remove -fforce-addr Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00135.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 11:19:26 -0400 > From: Aldy Hernandez > > I'll have a look myself. I just want to state for the record > > that this change indeed caused regressions. > > I only tested on x86-linux. Wot? First you said x86_64-linux! ;) Anyway, the point of this communication: was it really a good thing to remove all test-cases using -fforce-addr? Why not just remove their -fforce-addr argument? Can we add them back? brgds, H-P