public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Peter Bergner <bergner@vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@nildram.co.uk>,
		gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PING H.J. Lu] Re: [PATCH] PR35371 GCSE loses track of 	REG_POINTER  attribute
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:48:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080312144656.GA4941@lucon.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1205163133.6782.57.camel@otta>

On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:32:13AM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 17:08 -0600, Peter Bergner wrote:
> > HJ,
> > 
> > Given the x86/x86_64 issues with the last indexed load/store patch,
> > can you SPEC test this patch to make sure the rtlanal.c change doesn't
> > affect you?  Thanks.
> 
> HJ,
> 
> If you get a chance, can you please SPEC test the patch located in:
> 
>     http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg01442.html
> 
> just to make sure it doesn't have a negative impact on x86/x86_64?
> Thanks.

Hi Peter,

I can use gcc to compile SPEC CPU now. But your patch won't apply

patching file rtlanal.c
patching file gcse.c
Hunk #2 succeeded at 4463 (offset 7 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 6120 (offset 7 lines).
patching file emit-rtl.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] 

against revision 133140. Do you have an updated patch?

Thanks.

H.J.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-03-12 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-25 22:30 Peter Bergner
2008-02-25 23:13 ` Peter Bergner
2008-02-26  5:25 ` [PATCH,updated] " Peter Bergner
2008-02-26  5:49   ` [PATCH,withdrawn] " Peter Bergner
2008-02-26 18:00 ` [PATCH] " Richard Sandiford
2008-02-26 19:04   ` Peter Bergner
2008-02-26 19:45     ` Richard Sandiford
2008-02-26 20:06     ` Jeff Law
2008-02-29  1:32       ` Peter Bergner
2008-03-03 19:17         ` Jeff Law
2008-03-03 19:42           ` Peter Bergner
2008-03-03 20:55             ` Jeff Law
2008-03-10 15:32         ` [PING H.J. Lu] " Peter Bergner
2008-03-10 16:22           ` H.J. Lu
2008-03-12 14:48           ` H.J. Lu [this message]
2008-03-17 14:32             ` H.J. Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080312144656.GA4941@lucon.org \
    --to=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=bergner@vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=law@redhat.com \
    --cc=rsandifo@nildram.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).