From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-213667-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 21058 invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2008 14:48:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 21050 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Mar 2008 14:48:03 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from ag-out-0708.google.com (HELO ag-out-0708.google.com) (72.14.246.251)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:47:32 +0000
Received: by ag-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id 5so4670823agb.7         for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:47:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.150.148.7 with SMTP id v7mr4601721ybd.26.1205333249764;         Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:47:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lucon.org ( [75.61.137.74])         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s40sm9029762hsb.9.2008.03.12.07.47.11         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);         Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:47:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 500) 	id 9D8FA9801BE; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:46:56 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:48:00 -0000
To: Peter Bergner <bergner@vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@nildram.co.uk>, 	gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PING H.J. Lu] Re: [PATCH] PR35371 GCSE loses track of 	REG_POINTER  attribute
Message-ID: <20080312144656.GA4941@lucon.org>
References: <20080225222624.GA26857@vervain.rchland.ibm.com> <87skzfzkvh.fsf@firetop.home> <1204052325.7014.2.camel@otta> <47C467BA.1090308@redhat.com> <1204240130.7376.16.camel@otta> <1205163133.6782.57.camel@otta>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1205163133.6782.57.camel@otta>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00737.txt.bz2

On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:32:13AM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 17:08 -0600, Peter Bergner wrote:
> > HJ,
> > 
> > Given the x86/x86_64 issues with the last indexed load/store patch,
> > can you SPEC test this patch to make sure the rtlanal.c change doesn't
> > affect you?  Thanks.
> 
> HJ,
> 
> If you get a chance, can you please SPEC test the patch located in:
> 
>     http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg01442.html
> 
> just to make sure it doesn't have a negative impact on x86/x86_64?
> Thanks.

Hi Peter,

I can use gcc to compile SPEC CPU now. But your patch won't apply

patching file rtlanal.c
patching file gcse.c
Hunk #2 succeeded at 4463 (offset 7 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 6120 (offset 7 lines).
patching file emit-rtl.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] 

against revision 133140. Do you have an updated patch?

Thanks.

H.J.