From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12282 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2008 22:02:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 12273 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Mar 2008 22:02:55 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from province.act-europe.fr (HELO province.act-europe.fr) (212.99.106.214) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:02:34 +0000 Received: by province.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 525) id 228B1166C75; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:02:20 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:05:00 -0000 From: Arnaud Charlet To: Ralf Wildenhues , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH, ADA, DOC] PR 15479: Crossrefs and links Message-ID: <20080318220220.GA17497@adacore.com> References: <20080315135145.GG17579@ins.uni-bonn.de> <20080316182210.GA37514@adacore.com> <20080316220220.GA3899@ins.uni-bonn.de> <20080317075928.GA90987@adacore.com> <20080317191116.GB22463@ins.uni-bonn.de> <20080318075330.GC82298@adacore.com> <20080318214745.GG2094@ins.uni-bonn.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080318214745.GG2094@ins.uni-bonn.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg01099.txt.bz2 > Should it still be possible to build the VMS version of the User's Guide > as well as the UNW version using xgnatugn, Yes. But both will never end up under the same directory, so they can end up with the same name. > but both should now have the > same name? Or should just the UNW version be renamed to gnat_ugn.info? > Should it still be possible with xgnatugn to generate an UNW version > with the gnat_ugn_unw name? Preferably, yes. In other words, if you could keep xgnatugn as it is today, that'd be easier to handle. > Asking here because I assume that there is some build process external > to GCC which generates the VMS version (the code in gcc/ada/Make-lang.in Indeed, for the FSF version, currently only the unw version is generated, although I guess in theory, we could generate the other (when doing a VMS build, which probably nobody outside AdaCore does these days). Let me know if you have further questions. Arno