From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5929 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2008 22:26:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 5921 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Mar 2008 22:26:43 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from merkur.ins.uni-bonn.de (HELO merkur.ins.uni-bonn.de) (131.220.223.13) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:26:11 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (xdsl-87-78-111-8.netcologne.de [87.78.111.8]) by merkur.ins.uni-bonn.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B9A40000493; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 23:26:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from ralf by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Jf0Xq-00089i-In; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 23:26:02 +0100 Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:43:00 -0000 From: Ralf Wildenhues To: Tom Tromey Cc: David Daney , Diego Novillo , Mark Mitchell , Richard Guenther , Andreas Tobler , Gcc Patch List Subject: Re: Patch: automatic dependencies for gcc Message-ID: <20080327222602.GB25899@ins.uni-bonn.de> Mail-Followup-To: Ralf Wildenhues , Tom Tromey , David Daney , Diego Novillo , Mark Mitchell , Richard Guenther , Andreas Tobler , Gcc Patch List References: <84fc9c000803270353u1a2ddec8pf4edf2ecee753822@mail.gmail.com> <84fc9c000803270943j3ded7c7bq71ea706167005c8b@mail.gmail.com> <47EBE02A.9050103@codesourcery.com> <47EBF6F4.1060805@avtrex.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg01738.txt.bz2 * Tom Tromey wrote on Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 07:45:32PM CET: > > The thing that bothers me here isn't making mistakes -- I do that all > the time -- but rather that I really thought this patch was > bulletproof, that I'd tested it a lot, etc ... so I felt completely > blindsided by all the problems. This presses a lot of buttons for me. First, I would like to say that I'm very sorry that this was such a bad experience for you. Then, since you mention "all the problems", I wonder: were there any other show-stopper problems beside the hideous make bug? Cheers, Ralf