From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16337 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2008 22:23:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 16329 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jun 2008 22:23:27 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from province.act-europe.fr (HELO province.act-europe.fr) (212.99.106.214) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Jun 2008 22:23:08 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-province.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9F2165E2B; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:23:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from province.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (province.act-europe.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id POvGCHAbYdW1; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:23:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (dyn-83-152-121-148.ppp.tiscali.fr [83.152.121.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by province.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C74E165B5C; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:23:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Eric Botcazou To: "Ulrich Weigand" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix ICE in simplify_immed_subreg on SPU Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 22:24:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012) Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <200806151727.m5FHRZDv021734@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <200806151727.m5FHRZDv021734@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200806160024.08035.ebotcazou@adacore.com> Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00995.txt.bz2 > Why is this? It seems constructing the vector in the constant pool > and loading it from there is the most efficient way to load this > particular vector on the SPU -- but I don't see how to express this > in a different manner without using a CONST_VECTOR ... See the manual about CONST_VECTOR. Isn't the vector initializer already put in the constant pool as a CONSTRUCTOR at the tree level? -- Eric Botcazou