From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21309 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2008 20:34:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 21301 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jun 2008 20:34:40 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from merkur.ins.uni-bonn.de (HELO merkur.ins.uni-bonn.de) (131.220.223.13) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:34:08 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (xdsl-87-78-65-184.netcologne.de [87.78.65.184]) by merkur.ins.uni-bonn.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E94140001D4F; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:34:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ralf by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1K94Lk-0003Ew-9j; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:33:48 +0200 Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 21:05:00 -0000 From: Ralf Wildenhues To: "Joseph S. Myers" Cc: Mark Mitchell , Bernd Schmidt , Jie Zhang , GCC Patches , rdsandiford@googlemail.com Subject: Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Message-ID: <20080618203347.GG3773@ins.uni-bonn.de> Mail-Followup-To: Ralf Wildenhues , "Joseph S. Myers" , Mark Mitchell , Bernd Schmidt , Jie Zhang , GCC Patches , rdsandiford@googlemail.com References: <474C9B33.8060503@t-online.de> <474C9CBD.2070708@codesourcery.com> <87fxyqdc45.fsf@firetop.home> <474D943C.4030106@codesourcery.com> <877ik0aerh.fsf@firetop.home> <482CA836.6050801@t-online.de> <878wybdwu7.fsf@firetop.home> <482CBFD9.3050201@t-online.de> <482CC108.3000303@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg01209.txt.bz2 * Joseph S. Myers wrote on Fri, May 16, 2008 at 02:05:35AM CEST: > On Thu, 15 May 2008, Mark Mitchell wrote: > > Bernd Schmidt wrote: > > > > > I've now checked in the libstdc++-v3 patch, which is a reasonably obvious > > > bug fix. I've never had an opinion on whether other targets ought to fail > > > link tests, hence I'm not really interested in pursuing the other part of > > > the patch. I'll leave that to you or Mark, if you wish. > > > > I think the libstdc++-v3 change is indeed pretty obvious. > > As I understand it, it's also a regression fix that should go on 4.3 > branch as well. This has not happened yet. Is there anything holding it up? Also, I've been kind of wondering. AC_LIBTOOL_DLOPEN is also used in libgfortran and libmudflap; the latter has no GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES though. Do these directories never get built on newlib targets? Thanks, Ralf