public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Bergner <bergner@vnet.ibm.com>,
	sje@cup.hp.com,         luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>,
	        Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>,
	gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,         paolo.carlini@oracle.com
Subject: Re: Patch to fix gcc.c-torture/compile/20010102-1.c on IA64 HP-UX
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:53:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081031091116.GV14706@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4909FF11.7090009@redhat.com>

On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 12:38:09PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> Peter Bergner wrote:
>> On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 10:52 -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>> --- config/ia64/predicates.md   (revision 140417)
>> +++ config/ia64/predicates.md   (working copy)
>> @@ -585,6 +585,6 @@ (define_predicate "ar_pfs_reg_operand"
>>  (define_predicate "basereg_operand"
>>    (match_operand 0 "register_operand")
>>  {
>> -  return REG_P (op) && REG_POINTER (op);
>> +  return REG_P (op) && REG_POINTER (regno_reg_rtx[ORIGINAL_REGNO (op)]);
>>  })
>>
>> If you recall, that did solve the ICE you were hitting.  The rerename.c
>> change was just handling a case that looked like should be handled, but
>> wasn't necessary for fixing your IC
>>   
> We shouldn't be hacking up backends to deal with this problem, it's  
> entirely the wrong approach.

Why?  REG_POINTER can't (reliably) work on hard registers, because through
the life of one function one hard register might contain in some places
a pointer and in others non-pointer.  While pseudos should be always either
pointer or non-pointer.  IMHO (almost) all uses of REG_POINTER should
be changed to work on ORIGINAL_REGNO.

	Jakub

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-10-31  9:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-16 18:21 Steve Ellcey
2008-09-16 19:00 ` Peter Bergner
2008-09-16 19:20   ` Steve Ellcey
2008-09-16 19:40     ` Peter Bergner
2008-09-16 21:55       ` Jakub Jelinek
2008-09-17  1:22         ` Peter Bergner
2008-09-16 19:44     ` Jeff Law
2008-09-16 20:20       ` Peter Bergner
2008-09-16 20:49         ` Jeff Law
2008-09-16 20:49           ` Steve Ellcey
2008-09-16 21:31             ` Jeff Law
2008-09-16 21:40               ` Steve Ellcey
2008-09-17  1:54                 ` Peter Bergner
2008-09-17 17:31                   ` Steve Ellcey
2008-09-18 16:03                   ` Steve Ellcey
2008-09-18 20:38                     ` Peter Bergner
2008-09-16 21:48             ` Jeff Law
2008-09-16 22:00               ` Steve Ellcey
2008-09-18 20:59                 ` Richard Henderson
2008-09-19 18:56                   ` Steve Ellcey
2008-09-23 20:55                     ` Jeff Law
2008-09-23 21:08                       ` Steve Ellcey
2008-10-03 19:35                         ` Luis Machado
2008-10-04  0:47                           ` Jeff Law
2008-10-04  1:09                             ` Andrew Pinski
2008-10-16 21:46                               ` Luis Machado
2008-10-16 22:02                                 ` Jeff Law
2008-10-30 22:27                                   ` Luis Machado
2008-10-31  2:23                                     ` Steve Ellcey
2008-10-31  2:17                                       ` Peter Bergner
2008-10-31  2:03                                         ` Jeff Law
2008-10-31  1:50                                           ` Steve Ellcey
2008-11-06 18:00                                             ` Jeff Law
2008-10-31 10:53                                           ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2008-10-31 20:29                                           ` Peter Bergner
2008-10-31 20:50                                             ` Luis Machado
2008-10-31 21:27                                             ` Jakub Jelinek
2008-11-06 18:25                                     ` Jeff Law
2008-11-06 20:43 David Edelsohn
2008-11-06 22:05 ` Jeff Law
2008-11-06 23:29   ` David Edelsohn
2008-11-06 23:48     ` Jeff Law
2008-11-07 18:58       ` Luis Machado
2008-11-27 14:34       ` Luis Machado
2008-11-27 15:46         ` Richard Guenther
2008-11-27 20:32         ` Jeff Law
2008-11-27 21:07           ` Luis Machado
2008-11-27 23:24             ` Jeff Law
2009-05-26 16:50               ` Luis Machado
2009-06-01  3:55                 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2009-06-01 15:21                   ` Luis Machado

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081031091116.GV14706@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=bergner@vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=law@redhat.com \
    --cc=luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=paolo.carlini@oracle.com \
    --cc=pinskia@gmail.com \
    --cc=rth@redhat.com \
    --cc=sje@cup.hp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).