From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23912 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2009 21:25:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 23890 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Apr 2009 21:25:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from dair.pair.com (HELO dair.pair.com) (209.68.1.49) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 21:25:19 +0000 Received: (qmail 34129 invoked by uid 20157); 25 Apr 2009 21:25:16 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Apr 2009 21:25:16 -0000 Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 21:48:00 -0000 From: Hans-Peter Nilsson To: Gerald Pfeifer cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: test_summary: Only include LAST_UPDATED if it exists. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090425164448.D3750@dair.pair.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg02010.txt.bz2 On Sat, 25 Apr 2009, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > I had a look at the > source of gcc_update and don't see --touch modify LAST_UPDATED. You're right, I missed the early returns there; all option uses return early. > And > I don't think it should? I'd think 'svn update' + 'gcc_update --touch' = 'gcc_update' so you can e.g. do an initial checkout and a 'gcc_update --touch' and be all set for the initial run (using "gcc_update' for subsequent updates). But that might be just me. brgds, H-P