From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24237 invoked by alias); 23 Jul 2009 01:23:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 24218 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Jul 2009 01:23:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-51.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:23:39 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6N1NaWC017869; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:23:36 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n6N1NZIj018373; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:23:35 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (greed.delorie.com [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by greed.delorie.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n6N1NYu0000854; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:23:34 -0400 Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n6N1NYa6000851; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:23:34 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 02:24:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200907230123.n6N1NYa6000851@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: Douglas B Rupp CC: ian@airs.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org In-reply-to: <4A67BAA2.4020502@gnat.com> (message from Douglas B Rupp on Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:19:30 -0700) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Libiberty for VMS - mkstemps.c don't mix case References: <4A67B113.7010903@gnat.com> <200907230045.n6N0j7NW029586@greed.delorie.com> <4A67B704.6030402@gnat.com> <200907230110.n6N1Aqt6031945@greed.delorie.com> <4A67BAA2.4020502@gnat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg01259.txt.bz2 > VMS has file versioning, I think it would detect it only if the > version was specified or the directory was created with single > versioning. Doh! I forgot about that. Ok, that leads to a new question - shouldn't we specify a version, or single versioning, when creating temp files, so that someone else can't just create a new copy of the same file with a newer version and trip up the compiler? Or do the file permissions pass on to new versions?