From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18698 invoked by alias); 20 Oct 2009 15:08:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 18689 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Oct 2009 15:08:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nikam-dmz.ms.mff.cuni.cz (HELO nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz) (195.113.20.16) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:07:46 +0000 Received: by nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix, from userid 16202) id 6C7219AC881; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:07:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:10:00 -0000 From: Jan Hubicka To: Diego Novillo Cc: Jan Hubicka , martinj@suse.cz, rguenther@suse.de, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: LTO/WHOPR summary streaming fixes Message-ID: <20091020150744.GC8676@kam.mff.cuni.cz> References: <20091020145324.GA8676@kam.mff.cuni.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg01287.txt.bz2 > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:53, Jan Hubicka wrote: > > > + /* Write ipcp summary.  */ > > + static void > > + ipcp_write_summary (cgraph_node_set set) > > Document SET. Blank line after comment. > > > + { > > +   ipa_prop_write_jump_functions (set); > > + } > > + > > + /* Read ipcp summary.  */ > > + static void > > Blank line after comment. Note that whole ipacp file follows the scheme without empty line after function comment. We probably should reformat it, but since Martin has number of pending patches here, we probably could wait for next stage1? Honza