From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6203 invoked by alias); 20 Oct 2009 18:45:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 6187 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Oct 2009 18:45:22 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail55.messagelabs.com (HELO mail55.messagelabs.com) (216.82.241.163) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:45:17 +0000 X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: rittle@latour.labs.mot.com X-Msg-Ref: server-3.tower-55.messagelabs.com!1256064312!9898025!1 X-StarScan-Version: 6.1.3; banners=-,-,- Received: (qmail 11890 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2009 18:45:13 -0000 Received: from motgate5.mot.com (HELO motgate5.mot.com) (136.182.1.15) by server-3.tower-55.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 20 Oct 2009 18:45:13 -0000 Received: from il27exr03.cig.mot.com (il27exr03.mot.com [10.17.196.72]) by motgate5.mot.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n9KIj26S015708; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:45:12 -0700 (MST) Received: from il27vts01 (il27vts01.cig.mot.com [10.17.196.85]) by il27exr03.cig.mot.com (8.13.1/Vontu) with SMTP id n9KIj2vh005738; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:45:02 -0500 (CDT) Received: from latour.labs.mot.com (latour.labs.mot.com [10.2.201.16]) by il27exr03.cig.mot.com (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id n9KIj18m005727; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:45:01 -0500 (CDT) Received: from latour.labs.mot.com (localhost.labs.mot.com [127.0.0.1]) by latour.labs.mot.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n9KIhhlb072625; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:43:43 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rittle@latour.labs.mot.com) Received: (from rittle@localhost) by latour.labs.mot.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n9KIhhsX072622; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:43:43 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rittle) Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:52:00 -0000 From: Loren James Rittle Message-Id: <200910201843.n9KIhhsX072622@latour.labs.mot.com> To: Dave Korn CC: rguenther@suse.de, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, spop@gcc.gnu.org In-reply-to: <4ADDEFBA.7060302@gmail.com> (message from Dave Korn on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:13:30 +0100) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix GRAPHITE configure Reply-to: rittle@labs.mot.com References: <4ADDEFBA.7060302@gmail.com> User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.4 (Hosorogi) FLIM/1.14.4 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Kashiharaji?= =?ISO-8859-4?Q?ng=FE-mae?=) LEMI/1.14.1 Emacs/22.3 (i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.4 - "Hosorogi") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg01321.txt.bz2 In article <4ADDEFBA.7060302@gmail.com>, Dave Korn writes: > [ Cc added: Loren, who emailed me off-list about the top-level configure tests > reporting 'yes' even when ppl/cloog aren't going to be configured in. ] >>> It seems that even though the documentation states that --with-cloog >>> and --with-ppl need only be specified if cloog/ppl do not reside in >>> the default search paths graphite is disabled if I do not specify >>> them (with a correct path even). [...] > Loren, perhaps you'd like to test Richard's patch(*) and see if it does what > you wanted? Indeed, this patch is a superset of the fix that I speculated about. Regards, Loren