From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20507 invoked by alias); 22 Oct 2009 11:38:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 20495 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Oct 2009 11:38:34 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (212.99.106.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:38:31 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF8A229005D; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:38:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MegAJQt4C3cE; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:38:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (83-152-230-157.rev.libertysurf.net [83.152.230.157]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F5A29000C; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:38:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Eric Botcazou To: Martin Jambor Subject: Re: [Ada] constrained discriminated records and SRA Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:41:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012) Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <200909291257.28654.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <200910160858.13450.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <20091022104249.GA11795@virgil.suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <20091022104249.GA11795@virgil.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200910221340.23382.ebotcazou@adacore.com> Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg01412.txt.bz2 > So my suggestion would be to remove the whole comment, or replace it > with something saying that if looking up stuff in records is deemed > too slow in future, we should be able to simplify it now. FWIW fine with me either way. -- Eric Botcazou