From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: richard.guenther@gmail.com (Richard Guenther),
stevenb.gcc@gmail.com (Steven Bosscher),
dnovillo@google.com, froydnj@codesourcery.com
Subject: [4.5 regression] C++ ignores some aligned attributes (Re: [PATCH] fix arm neon ICE by widening tree_type's precision field)
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:01:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201007281836.o6SIae5w007891@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090609163111.GA21107@codesourcery.com> from "Nathan Froyd" at Jun 09, 2009 09:31:11 AM
Nathan Froyd wrote:
> 2009-06-09 Nathan Froyd <froydnj@codesourcery.com>
>
> * tree.h (tree_base): Add packed_flag and user_align fields.
> Decrease size of spare field.
> (TYPE_USER_ALIGN): Use user_align from tree_base.
> (DECL_USER_ALIGN): Likewise.
It seems this broke attribute ((aligned)) handling for certain
cases in C++, which causes crashes in the Mozilla JavaScript
interpreter under some circumstances.
I've opened PR c++/45112 for this problem. The bug occurs with
code like the following:
struct JSString
{
unsigned char mLength;
static JSString unitStringTable[];
};
JSString JSString::unitStringTable[] __attribute__ ((aligned (8))) = { 1 };
(extracted and simplified from Mozilla), where the aligned attribute
seems to be simply ignored from 4.5 on.
The C++ front-end sees two DECLs here, one for the declaration (with
DECL_USER_ALIGN cleared) and one for the definition (with DECL_USER_ALIGN
set). These are supposed to be merged by cp-decl.c:duplicate_decls.
Before this patch, this would happen inside the following memcpy:
memcpy ((char *) olddecl + sizeof (struct tree_common),
(char *) newdecl + sizeof (struct tree_common),
sizeof (struct tree_decl_common) - sizeof (struct tree_common));
which copied everything in tree_decl_common, *except* what is
in tree_common.
Now, the patch unfortunately moves the user_align (and packed_flag)
fields out of the area copied by this memcpy, and into tree_common.
It seems this means it now ought to be handled manually, but this
code is missing ...
I'll try to come up with a fix. Any thoughts from C++ folks?
Bye,
Ulrich
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-28 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-08 15:32 [PATCH] fix arm neon ICE by widening tree_type's precision field Nathan Froyd
2009-06-08 17:11 ` Richard Guenther
2009-06-08 18:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-06-08 20:28 ` Nathan Froyd
2009-06-08 20:32 ` Steven Bosscher
2009-06-09 6:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-06-09 14:54 ` Nathan Froyd
2009-06-09 15:00 ` Richard Guenther
2009-06-09 15:07 ` Richard Guenther
2009-06-09 15:44 ` Steven Bosscher
2009-06-10 2:50 ` Eric Botcazou
2009-06-09 15:40 ` Steven Bosscher
2009-06-09 15:53 ` Richard Guenther
2009-06-09 16:31 ` Nathan Froyd
2009-06-09 16:34 ` Richard Guenther
2009-06-09 16:36 ` Diego Novillo
2009-06-09 17:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-07-28 19:01 ` Ulrich Weigand [this message]
2010-07-28 19:40 ` [4.5 regression] C++ ignores some aligned attributes (Re: [PATCH] fix arm neon ICE by widening tree_type's precision field) Richard Guenther
2010-07-29 12:29 ` [4.5 regression] C++ ignores some aligned attributes (Re: [PATCH] fix arm neon ICE by widening tree_type's precision field Ulrich Weigand
2010-07-28 22:07 ` [PATCH] [4.5 regression] C++ ignores some aligned attributes Ulrich Weigand
2010-07-30 16:00 ` Ulrich Weigand
2010-07-30 16:22 ` Richard Guenther
2010-07-30 16:22 ` Ulrich Weigand
2010-07-31 17:45 ` Eric Botcazou
2010-07-31 19:38 ` Ulrich Weigand
2010-08-04 14:03 ` Paul Brook
2010-08-04 14:19 ` Ulrich Weigand
2010-08-04 14:27 ` Mark Mitchell
2010-08-04 15:04 ` Paul Brook
2010-08-04 16:42 ` Ulrich Weigand
2010-08-04 15:33 ` Martin Sebor
2010-08-04 15:47 ` Mark Mitchell
2010-08-05 9:02 ` Martin Sebor
2009-06-08 19:40 ` [PATCH] fix arm neon ICE by widening tree_type's precision field Joseph S. Myers
2009-06-08 19:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-06-08 20:12 ` Andrew Pinski
2009-06-08 20:20 ` Jakub Jelinek
2009-06-08 20:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201007281836.o6SIae5w007891@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com \
--to=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=dnovillo@google.com \
--cc=froydnj@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=stevenb.gcc@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).