public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jack Howarth <howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu>
To: Andreas Simbuerger <simbuerg@googlemail.com>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
	gcc-graphite@googlegroups.com,        gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Configure support for official CLooG versions.
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:39:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100812133917.GA24267@bromo.med.uc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C632351.7050905@googlemail.com>

On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:25:21AM +0200, Andreas Simbuerger wrote:
>  On 08/11/2010 11:55 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, Andreas Simbürger wrote:
> >
> >> this patch series adds configure support for upstream CLooG versions.
> >> The official CLooG is able to use three different backends during
> >> code generation. An ISL backend, a PPL backend and a PolyLib backend.
> > Does ISL involve another library that would be linked against instead of 
> > PPL, that needs installing separately from CLooG?  If so, this patch 
> > series appears incomplete, as it doesn't include any addition of 
> > information about ISL to install.texi, or --with-isl etc. options 
> > analogous to the --with-ppl options, or configure code that adds -lisl or 
> > similar (as opposed to -lcloog-isl).  All these things are needed for 
> > making GCC link with a new host-side library.  In addition it will be 
> > necessary to check the portability of ISL to different hosts, similarly to 
> > how people tested PPL on various hosts before the original Graphite merge, 
> > including cases such as building it with cross compilers.
> >
> The Integer Set Library (ISL) is used within CLooG's backend instead
> of the PPL (Another backend using the PolyLib is available too).
> The official CLooG version provides it's own ISL bundle which
> get's installed alongside CLooG itself. The ISL is exclusively used by
> CLooG for now.

Andreas,
    Are there any benchmarks comparing the performance of graphite with
cloog-isl, cloog-polylib and cloog-ppl? In particular, how do the three
compare in effectiveness of properly finding loops and are there large
differences in the time they require to process the data? I had assumed
that cloog-ppl built against ppl-0.11 would be the preferred option
for graphite in gcc 4.6.
                    Jack
> 
> This patch series only prepare GCC for the transition from the CLooG-PPL
> fork,
> maintained by Graphite to the CLooG versions maintained by upstream.
> 
> Regards,
> Andreas
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-08-12 13:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <cloog1>
2010-08-11 18:30 ` [PATCH 2/3] Fix include order to avoid failed compilation on CLOOG_ORG Andreas Simbürger
2010-08-11 21:01   ` Sebastian Pop
2010-08-11 18:30 ` [PATCH 0/3] Configure support for official CLooG versions Andreas Simbürger
2010-08-11 19:02   ` Sebastian Pop
2010-08-11 19:18     ` Jack Howarth
2010-08-11 19:27       ` Andreas Simbuerger
2010-08-11 21:55         ` Matthias Klose
     [not found]     ` <2876_1281553691_4C62F51B_2876_2281_1_20100811190756.GB18599@bromo.med.uc.edu>
2010-08-11 19:23       ` Tobias Grosser
2010-08-12  6:14     ` Roberto Bagnara
2010-08-21  9:16     ` Gerald Pfeifer
2010-08-23 16:51       ` Richard Guenther
2010-08-11 19:08   ` Jack Howarth
2010-08-11 20:37     ` Andreas Simbuerger
2010-08-11 22:13   ` Joseph S. Myers
2010-08-11 22:34     ` Andreas Simbuerger
2010-08-11 23:39       ` Joseph S. Myers
2010-08-12  8:05         ` Andreas Simbuerger
2010-08-12 10:01           ` Joseph S. Myers
2010-08-12 20:25             ` Andreas Simbuerger
2010-08-13 15:01               ` Jack Howarth
2010-08-13 16:09                 ` Andreas Simbuerger
2010-08-13 19:25                   ` Sebastian Pop
2010-08-12 13:39       ` Jack Howarth [this message]
2010-08-12 18:52         ` Andreas Simbuerger
2010-08-12 19:43           ` Jack Howarth
2010-08-13 16:09             ` Andreas Simbuerger
2010-08-13 16:16               ` Jack Howarth
2010-08-13 16:31                 ` Andreas Simbuerger
2010-08-11 18:30 ` [PATCH 1/3] Add necessary accessors for CloogMatrix (CLOOG_ORG) Andreas Simbürger
2010-08-11 20:54   ` Sebastian Pop
2010-08-11 18:45 ` [PATCH 3/3] Support official CLooG.org versions Andreas Simbürger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100812133917.GA24267@bromo.med.uc.edu \
    --to=howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu \
    --cc=gcc-graphite@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=simbuerg@googlemail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).