From: Jack Howarth <howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu>
To: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de>,
Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, iains@gcc.gnu.org,
mikestump@comcast.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Avoid -lm and -lpthread in libjava on darwin
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 22:08:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100812213826.GC26124@bromo.med.uc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100812210945.GA5561@gmx.de>
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:09:46PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Andrew Pinski wrote on Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 08:23:13PM CEST:
> > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > Is this patch necessary with the remove-outfile patch in place?
> >
> > Yes because libtool calls ld directly for libjava. I wish it did not
> > but it does.
>
> * Jack Howarth wrote on Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 08:24:30PM CEST:
> > The remove-outfile patch is necessary to make sure that the gcc
> > compilers don't shift libSystem forward in the linkage and
> > disrupt the logic behind libgcc_ext when -ldl, -lm or -lpthread
> > is passed to the compiler. The libjava patch covers the hardcoding
> > of -lpthread and -lm into the linker flags that are passed via
> > libtool directly to the linker.
>
> So do I understand correctly that this ought to be fixed in libtool?
> Is the requirement to have libSystem last one that is specific to GCC
> or common to all software built with GCC?
Ralf,
The requirement to keep libSystem last is a result of the addition of
libgcc_ext in FSF gcc-4.5 and later. The libgcc_ext shared library uses
versioned stubs to export those additional symbols from libgcc_s which aren't
present in Apple's versioned libgcc's. This is discussed in the
long and winding http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39888.
Basically we need to insure that the linkage stays as...
/usr/lib/libgcc_s.1.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 625.0.0)
/sw/lib/gcc4.6/lib/libgcc_s.1.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 1.0.0)
/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 125.2.0)
without my remove-outfile patch, if you pass -ldl, -lm or -lpthread to the gcc compiler,
it will change the linkage to...
/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 125.2.0)
/usr/lib/libgcc_s.1.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 625.0.0)
/sw/lib/gcc4.5/lib/libgcc_s.1.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 1.0.0)
which breaks the logic used by libgcc_ext. The same problem can arise if a program
manually links via libtool with ld (even in the presence of the remove-outfile patch).
Hence the second libjava patch which prevents -lm and -lpthread from being used in the
libjava build on darwin.
Jack
ps Note that testresults with the two patches from last night eliminated the failures
in gcc.dg/torture/builtin-math-7.c (PR42333) by insuring that the non-buggy FSF libgcc
___divdc3 routine is used instead of the less accurate one from the compiler-rt.llvm.org
project code. This is just as well since Apple doesn't seem interested in fixing that one...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42333#c47
>
> Thanks,
> Ralf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-12 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-12 11:44 Jack Howarth
2010-08-12 13:04 ` Andrew Haley
2010-08-18 9:05 ` IainS
2010-08-12 18:22 ` Richard Henderson
2010-08-12 18:24 ` Andrew Pinski
2010-08-12 21:34 ` Ralf Wildenhues
2010-08-12 22:08 ` Jack Howarth [this message]
2010-08-12 22:36 ` Jack Howarth
2010-08-12 23:21 ` IainS
2010-08-12 23:34 ` IainS
2010-08-13 0:28 ` Jack Howarth
2010-08-12 18:26 ` Jack Howarth
2010-08-12 22:33 ` Mike Stump
2010-08-12 22:46 ` IainS
2010-08-13 5:59 ` Mike Stump
2010-08-12 22:47 ` Mike Stump
2010-08-12 23:08 ` Jack Howarth
2010-08-13 10:08 ` Andrew Haley
2010-08-12 22:59 ` IainS
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100812213826.GC26124@bromo.med.uc.edu \
--to=howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu \
--cc=Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=iains@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=mikestump@comcast.net \
--cc=pinskia@gmail.com \
--cc=rth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).