From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3368 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2010 22:14:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 3356 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Aug 2010 22:14:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (212.99.106.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:14:44 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990DDCB023F; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:14:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LJXGmxcLan5G; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:14:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from new-host.home (ADijon-552-1-89-120.w92-148.abo.wanadoo.fr [92.148.136.120]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12417CB0202; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:14:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Eric Botcazou To: Bernd Schmidt Subject: Re: Combine four insns Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:21:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Mark Mitchell , Richard Guenther , David Daney , Andi Kleen , Steven Bosscher References: <4C5C20D0.5020105@codesourcery.com> <201008192359.35178.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <4C6DA9E3.8030108@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <4C6DA9E3.8030108@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201008200014.26203.ebotcazou@adacore.com> Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg01514.txt.bz2 > >for the second one you checked in something without approval > > I don't believe this is the case. Where, specifically? Your message: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-07/msg02214.html Paolo's reply: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-07/msg02226.html -- Eric Botcazou