Hello All


Please notice that I made a mail mistake in the previous patch chunk.
The 6th patch [wstate] is in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg01716.html and not in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg01714.html which got the
wrong attachments (no patches there!).  Sorry for the noise.

References
  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg01716.html 
  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg01032.html
  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg01081.html

The last patch takes into account Lauryanas remarks in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg01081.html and is a
documentation patch. I added some more explanations so please check my
poor english language.

I still hope that my patch serie "thirdround" will be Ok, with perhaps
minor changes required.


#################### gcc/ChangeLog entry for documentation 
2010-09-21  Basile Starynkevitch  <basile@starynkevitch.net>

	* gcc/doc/gty.texi:
	(Generating GGC code with gengtype): New node.
	(GTY Options): Documented that tag should be unique.
	Added ptr_alias documentation.
	(How to run the gengtype generator): New section.
################################################################

The attached patch is relative to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg01716.html 

Ok for trunk? With what changes?

BTW, the dates in the patch series (and notably their ChangeLog entry)
might be wrong. If Ok-ed, I will put the date (as seen from Paris,
France) of the commit.

Cheers

-- 
Basile STARYNKEVITCH         http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France
*** opinions {are only mine, sont seulement les miennes} ***