From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-286737-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 27324 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2011 17:21:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 27309 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Mar 2011 17:21:50 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 17:21:46 +0000
Received: (qmail 29048 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 17:21:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (froydnj@127.0.0.2)  by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 11 Mar 2011 17:21:44 -0000
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 17:21:00 -0000
From: Nathan Froyd <froydnj@codesourcery.com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/18] make TS_IDENTIFIER be a substructure of TS_BASE
Message-ID: <20110311172143.GN23686@codesourcery.com>
References: <1299817406-16745-1-git-send-email-froydnj@codesourcery.com> <1299817406-16745-17-git-send-email-froydnj@codesourcery.com> <AANLkTin6rO3XJ=+mCe=6d=gcD6mm+mis15uJf+qbDmqc@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin6rO3XJ=+mCe=6d=gcD6mm+mis15uJf+qbDmqc@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00650.txt.bz2

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 02:12:06PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:23 AM, Nathan Froyd <froydnj@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> > Now that we've done the requisite surgery on the C++ FE, we can
> > eliminate TREE_CHAIN and TREE_TYPE from IDENTIFIER_NODEs.  Doing so
> > turns up a couple different places that need to be tweaked.
> 
> At some point we should zero-out DECL/TYPE_LANG_SPECIFIC, I
> don't remember why we don't do that.
> 
> The patch is ok for 4.7 anyway.

Given Jason's comments on patch 15/18, I'll be dropping chunks of this
and just eliminating TREE_CHAIN from IDENTIFIER_NODEs for now.  Since
those changes are trivial, I'm going to assume I don't need separate
approval for those (appropriate testing will of course be performed).

-Nathan