From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27171 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2011 17:50:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 27134 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Mar 2011 17:50:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:50:16 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 374CFCB02DC; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:50:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2wz72R0S7bLk; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:50:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (bon31-9-83-155-120-49.fbx.proxad.net [83.155.120.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A89DCB0354; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:50:02 +0100 (CET) From: Eric Botcazou To: Nathan Froyd Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/18] enforce TREE_CHAIN and TREE_TYPE accesses Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:50:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <1299817406-16745-1-git-send-email-froydnj@codesourcery.com> <201103121308.24092.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <20110321135015.GH30619@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <20110321135015.GH30619@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201103211845.39434.ebotcazou@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg01320.txt.bz2 > You're right, though; they should probably be marked as such for > completeness. OK to commit with those additions and reordering as above > sight unseen, or would you like to see the patch? Note that I didn't ask for that, only for a comment explaining why they were set aside. So it's up to you and, yes, you can commit without reposting. -- Eric Botcazou