From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
To: Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] Removal of cgraph_node function
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:28:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110411102836.GD32348@kam.mff.cuni.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110406232245.685459535@virgil.suse.cz>
> 2011-04-06 Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>
>
> * cgraph.h (cgraph_node): Remove function declaration.
> (cgraph_create_node): Declare.
> (cgraph_get_create_node): Likewise.
>
> * cgraph.c (cgraph_create_node): Renamed to cgraph_create_node_1.
> Updated all callers.
> (cgraph_node): Renamed to cgraph_create_node, assert that a node for
> the decl does not already exist. Call cgraph_get_create_node instead
> of cgraph_node.
> (cgraph_get_create_node): New function.
> (cgraph_same_body_alias): Update comment.
> (cgraph_set_call_stmt): Call cgraph_get_node instead of cgraph_node,
> assert it does not return NULL.
> (cgraph_update_edges_for_call_stmt): Likewise.
> (cgraph_clone_edge): Likewise.
> (cgraph_create_virtual_clone): Likewise.
> (cgraph_update_edges_for_call_stmt_node): Call cgraph_get_create_node
> instead of cgraph_node.
> (cgraph_add_new_function): Call cgraph_create_node or
> cgraph_get_create_node instead of cgraph_node.
>
> * cgraphbuild.c (record_reference): Call cgraph_get_create_node
> instead of cgraph_node.
> (record_eh_tables): Likewise.
> (mark_address): Likewise.
> (mark_load): Likewise.
> (build_cgraph_edges): Call cgraph_get_create_node instead
> of cgraph_node.
> (rebuild_cgraph_edges): Likewise.
>
> * cgraphunit.c (cgraph_finalize_function): Call cgraph_get_create_node
> instead of cgraph_node.
> (cgraph_copy_node_for_versioning): Call cgraph_create_node instead of
> cgraph_node.
>
> * lto-symtab.c (lto_symtab_merge_cgraph_nodes_1): Call
> cgraph_create_node instead of cgraph_node.
>
> * c-decl.c (finish_function): Call cgraph_get_create_node instead
> of cgraph_node.
> * lto-cgraph.c (input_node): Likewise.
> * lto-streamer-in.c (input_function): Likewise.
> * varasm.c (mark_decl_referenced): Likewise.
> (assemble_alias): Likewise.
>
> gcc/c-family/
> * c-gimplify.c (c_genericize): Call cgraph_get_create_node instead
> of cgraph_node.
>
> gcc/cp/
> * cp/class.c (cp_fold_obj_type_ref): Call cgraph_get_create_node
> instead of cgraph_node.
> * cp/decl2.c (cxx_callgraph_analyze_expr): Likewise.
> (cp_write_global_declarations): Likewise.
> * cp/optimize.c (maybe_clone_body): Likewise.
> * cp/semantics.c (maybe_add_lambda_conv_op): Likewise.
> * cp/mangle.c (mangle_decl): Likewise.
> * cp/method.c (make_alias_for_thunk): Likewise.
> (use_thunk): Likewise.
>
> gcc/ada/
> * gcc-interface/utils.c (end_subprog_body): Call
> cgraph_get_create_node instead of cgraph_node.
>
> gcc/fortran/
> * trans-decl.c (gfc_generate_function_code): Call
> cgraph_get_create_node instead of cgraph_node.
>
> gcc/objc/
> * objc-act.c (mark_referenced_methods): Call cgraph_get_create_node
> instead of cgraph_node.
OK.
> Index: src/gcc/lto-cgraph.c
> ===================================================================
> --- src.orig/gcc/lto-cgraph.c
> +++ src/gcc/lto-cgraph.c
> @@ -1045,7 +1045,7 @@ input_node (struct lto_file_decl_data *f
> 0, CGRAPH_FREQ_BASE, 0, false, NULL);
> }
> else
> - node = cgraph_node (fn_decl);
> + node = cgraph_get_create_node (fn_decl);
>
> node->count = lto_input_sleb128 (ib);
> node->count_materialization_scale = lto_input_sleb128 (ib);
> Index: src/gcc/lto-streamer-in.c
> ===================================================================
> --- src.orig/gcc/lto-streamer-in.c
> +++ src/gcc/lto-streamer-in.c
> @@ -1301,7 +1301,7 @@ input_function (tree fn_decl, struct dat
> DECL_INITIAL (fn_decl) = lto_input_tree (ib, data_in);
> gcc_assert (DECL_INITIAL (fn_decl));
> DECL_SAVED_TREE (fn_decl) = NULL_TREE;
> - node = cgraph_node (fn_decl);
> + node = cgraph_get_create_node (fn_decl);
I would expect those two to be cgraph_create_node and cgraph_get_node or we
have latent bug somewhere. Did you have particular reason for the choice here?
I guess we can handle this incrementally.
> Index: src/gcc/cgraphbuild.c
> ===================================================================
> --- src.orig/gcc/cgraphbuild.c
> +++ src/gcc/cgraphbuild.c
> @@ -74,9 +74,9 @@ record_reference (tree *tp, int *walk_su
> if (TREE_CODE (decl) == FUNCTION_DECL)
> {
> if (!ctx->only_vars)
> - cgraph_mark_address_taken_node (cgraph_node (decl));
> + cgraph_mark_address_taken_node (cgraph_get_create_node (decl));
> ipa_record_reference (NULL, ctx->varpool_node,
> - cgraph_node (decl), NULL,
> + cgraph_get_node (decl), NULL,
Please CSE the cgraph_get_create_node call here. In both cases we want
get_create_node, during the later cgraph builds the new nodes ight become needed
as result of devirtualization and external construvctor folding.
Honza
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-11 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-06 23:25 [PATCH 0/7] Change of call graph interface - cgraph_node function removal Martin Jambor
2011-04-06 23:26 ` [PATCH 4/7] Removal of cgraph_node function Martin Jambor
2011-04-11 10:28 ` Jan Hubicka [this message]
2011-04-11 14:15 ` Martin Jambor
2011-04-06 23:26 ` [PATCH 6/7] A tweak to fortran -> call graph interface Martin Jambor
2011-04-06 23:26 ` [PATCH 5/7] Tweaks to C++ " Martin Jambor
2011-04-11 15:30 ` Jason Merrill
2011-04-06 23:26 ` [PATCH 3/7] cgraph_node -> cgraph_get_node with asserts Martin Jambor
2011-04-11 10:20 ` Jan Hubicka
2011-04-06 23:26 ` [PATCH 7/7] Tweaks to objc -> call graph interface Martin Jambor
2011-04-06 23:26 ` [PATCH 1/7] Simple cgraph_node -> cgraph_get_node conversions Martin Jambor
2011-04-11 10:13 ` Jan Hubicka
2011-04-13 13:09 ` H.J. Lu
2011-04-06 23:26 ` [PATCH 2/7] cgraph_node -> cgraph_get_node conversions accepting NULL results Martin Jambor
2011-04-11 10:18 ` Jan Hubicka
2011-04-11 13:33 ` Martin Jambor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110411102836.GD32348@kam.mff.cuni.cz \
--to=hubicka@ucw.cz \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=mjambor@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).