public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Froyd <froydnj@codesourcery.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: iant@google.com, dnovillo@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/18] enforce TREE_CHAIN and TREE_TYPE accesses
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 02:43:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110413024341.GT23480@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1299817406-16745-3-git-send-email-froydnj@codesourcery.com>

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:23:10PM -0500, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> Now that we have a structure where not every node might include
> TREE_CHAIN or TREE_TYPE, we need to make sure that when we call said
> accessors that the argument is properly typed.  This requires a number
> of changes:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg00565.html

Ping.  I was going to commit this, but I realized I hadn't received
approval for the go or LTO bits.  They probably qualify as obvious,
given that they're exactly the same as all the other languages, but just
to rubber-stamp everything...

> gcc/go/
> 	* go-lang.c (union lang_tree_node): Check for TS_COMMON before
> 	calling TREE_CHAIN.
> 
> gcc/lto/
> 	* lto-tree.h (union lang_tree_node): Check for TS_COMMON before
> 	calling TREE_CHAIN.
> 	* lto.c (lto_fixup_common): Likewise.

Thanks,
-Nathan

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-04-13  2:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-11  4:23 [4.7 PATCH 00/18] slim down a number of tree nodes Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11  4:23 ` [PATCH 05/18] remove TREE_CHAIN from CONSTRUCTOR nodes Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:05   ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11  4:23 ` [PATCH 04/18] remove TREE_CHAIN from SSA_NAME nodes Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:06   ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11  4:24 ` [PATCH 08/18] convert cp *FOR_STMTs to use private scope fields Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11  4:24 ` [PATCH 06/18] define CASE_CHAIN accessor for CASE_LABEL_EXPR Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:07   ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11  4:24 ` [PATCH 10/18] convert cp SWITCH_STMTs to use private scope fields Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11  4:24 ` [PATCH 15/18] move REAL_IDENTIFIER_TYPE_VALUE to be a field of lang_identifier Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:40   ` Jason Merrill
2011-03-11 14:04     ` Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 14:20       ` Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 15:04         ` Jason Merrill
2011-03-11 16:23           ` Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 17:17             ` Jason Merrill
2011-03-11 14:41     ` Joseph S. Myers
2011-03-11  4:24 ` [PATCH 01/18] add typed_tree structure Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:05   ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11 15:21   ` Michael Matz
2011-03-11  4:24 ` [PATCH 13/18] move TS_EXP to be a substructure of TS_TYPED Nathan Froyd
2011-05-11  0:34   ` Nathan Froyd
2011-05-17 17:51     ` [PING][PATCH " Nathan Froyd
2011-05-23 14:58       ` Nathan Froyd
2011-05-23 15:34         ` Richard Guenther
2011-05-24 18:52           ` Nathan Froyd
2011-05-25  9:59             ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11  4:24 ` [PATCH 03/18] remove TREE_CHAIN from *_CST nodes Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:05   ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11  4:24 ` [PATCH 07/18] generalize build_case_label to the rest of the compiler Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:01   ` Joseph S. Myers
2011-03-11 13:10     ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11 14:56   ` Tom Tromey
2011-03-11  4:24 ` [PATCH 16/18] make TS_IDENTIFIER be a substructure of TS_BASE Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:12   ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11 17:21     ` Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11  4:24 ` [PATCH 14/18] move TS_STATEMENT_LIST to be a substructure of TS_TYPED Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11  6:01   ` Jason Merrill
2011-03-11 12:23     ` Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11  4:30 ` [PATCH 11/18] mark EXPR_PACK_EXPANSION as typed only Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11  4:30 ` [PATCH 09/18] convert cp IF_STMTs to use private scope fields Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11  4:31 ` [PATCH 17/18] introduce block_chainon and use BLOCK_CHAIN more Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:15   ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11 13:19     ` Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 15:14   ` Tom Tromey
2011-03-12 12:23   ` Eric Botcazou
2011-03-11  4:31 ` [PATCH 18/18] make TS_BLOCK a substructure of TS_BASE Nathan Froyd
2011-05-26 18:30   ` Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11  4:31 ` [PATCH 02/18] enforce TREE_CHAIN and TREE_TYPE accesses Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11  8:12   ` Mike Stump
2011-03-11 13:21   ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11 15:24   ` Tom Tromey
2011-03-12 12:13   ` Eric Botcazou
2011-03-21 13:50     ` Nathan Froyd
2011-03-21 17:50       ` Eric Botcazou
2011-04-13  2:43   ` Nathan Froyd [this message]
2011-04-13  2:57     ` Diego Novillo
2011-04-13  4:02     ` Ian Lance Taylor
2011-03-11  4:50 ` [PATCH 12/18] make CASE_LABEL_EXPR not abuse TREE_CHAIN Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:19   ` Richard Guenther
2011-05-10 20:08     ` Nathan Froyd
2011-05-10 20:19     ` Diego Novillo
2011-05-11  9:21       ` Richard Guenther
2011-05-11 19:22   ` H.J. Lu
2011-03-11  8:18 ` [4.7 PATCH 00/18] slim down a number of tree nodes Mike Stump
2011-03-11 16:00   ` Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:25 ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11 13:42   ` Nathan Froyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110413024341.GT23480@codesourcery.com \
    --to=froydnj@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=dnovillo@google.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=iant@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).