From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11049 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2011 10:04:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 11039 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Apr 2011 10:04:03 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,TW_CX X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 10:03:49 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 301E6CB03DC; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 12:03:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TxtSkQCnY0gb; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 12:03:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (bon31-9-83-155-120-49.fbx.proxad.net [83.155.120.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F9FDCB03DB; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 12:03:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Eric Botcazou To: Michael Matz Subject: Re: Remember/restore ALLOCA_FOR_VAR_P over tuples Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 12:53:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201104161157.20691.ebotcazou@adacore.com> Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg01271.txt.bz2 > r172516, for reference also below. I later saw that my patch causes > cxg2001 to fail. I've analyzed it enough to be sure that it's only > exposed by this patch (due to inlining now happening), in fact it's a > problem in IRA that is reproducible with a C++ testcase even without the > patch. I've filed PR48633 for this. Thanks for debugging the problem. I was expecting some fallouts in Ada because this will shake a little the compiler, but the results of our internal testing don't show other problems than this ACATS failure, so that's great. -- Eric Botcazou