From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7242 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2011 14:29:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 7234 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Apr 2011 14:29:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz (HELO nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz) (195.113.20.16) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 14:29:11 +0000 Received: by nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix, from userid 16202) id A185D9AC7F7; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 16:29:10 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 15:29:00 -0000 From: Jan Hubicka To: Dominique Dhumieres Cc: hubicka@ucw.cz, richard.guenther@gmail.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Inliner heuristics facelift Message-ID: <20110417142910.GG5273@kam.mff.cuni.cz> References: <20110417105416.A26E33BE18@mailhost.lps.ens.fr> <20110417123842.GE5273@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20110417142511.CF3D53BE18@mailhost.lps.ens.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110417142511.CF3D53BE18@mailhost.lps.ens.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg01322.txt.bz2 > > For me, I get everything inlined except for: > > Oops! looking at my mail, I realized that I did not timed fatigue, but ac. > With the patch the only difference for fatigue is that the threshold for > full inlining decreased from 125 to 113. See, we make progress. 10 more patches like this and you can set threshold to 0 ;) This is expected behaviour - the patch changes interpretation of inline bounds from limits on function sizes on limits of estimated function sizes after inlining. Those 12 instructions are accounting function call overhead. Honza > > Sorry for the noise. > > Dominique