From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-289957-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29670 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2011 17:53:33 -0000
Received: (qmail 29652 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Apr 2011 17:53:32 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 17:53:18 +0000
Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p3JHrISn004504	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:53:18 -0400
Received: from tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com (tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com [10.16.42.4])	by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p3JHrHVn017883	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);	Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:53:18 -0400
Received: from tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])	by tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p3JHrHm1010079;	Tue, 19 Apr 2011 19:53:17 +0200
Received: (from jakub@localhost)	by tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p3JHrGii010077;	Tue, 19 Apr 2011 19:53:16 +0200
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 18:12:00 -0000
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Janne Blomqvist <blomqvist.janne@gmail.com>
Cc: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>,        Fortran List <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>,        GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] Use xcalloc instead of gfc_getmem
Message-ID: <20110419175316.GM17079@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com>
Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
References: <BANLkTinsA7qU1UoTPq5F7uE2E0J5_D-mTA@mail.gmail.com> <20110418205028.GA54731@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <BANLkTinJrUeanGQpSG7gVvpjLg+x4msa6w@mail.gmail.com> <20110419074627.GG17079@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> <BANLkTiksS8oc_66GuDsW9r0Em9qhx=ggVw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTiksS8oc_66GuDsW9r0Em9qhx=ggVw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg01561.txt.bz2

On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 08:46:17PM +0300, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> Oh, those macros are nice. I updated the patch to use them instead,
> except for one case where the usage didn't fit the XCNEW(VEC) API and
> I used xcalloc directly instead.  Here's what I committed:

For that remaining case there is XCNEWVAR, i.e.
    b = XCNEWVAR (gfc_linebuf, gfc_linebuf_header_size 
			       + (len + 1) * sizeof (gfc_char_t));

	Jakub