From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-291573-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 15084 invoked by alias); 10 May 2011 14:06:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 15019 invoked by uid 22791); 10 May 2011 14:06:09 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 14:05:57 +0000
Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4AE5NSC014407	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Tue, 10 May 2011 10:05:23 -0400
Received: from tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com (tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com [10.16.42.4])	by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4AE5LPH003273	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);	Tue, 10 May 2011 10:05:22 -0400
Received: from tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])	by tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4AE5K1m019222;	Tue, 10 May 2011 16:05:21 +0200
Received: (from jakub@localhost)	by tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p4AE5JCd019220;	Tue, 10 May 2011 16:05:19 +0200
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 15:08:00 -0000
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Cc: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,        Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>,        "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>,        Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>, Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>,        gcc-patches@sourceware.org, satorux@google.com, aoliva@redhat.com,        dj@redhat.com, neroden@gcc.gnu.org, Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [patch] make default linker --hash-style configurable option
Message-ID: <20110510140519.GB17079@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com>
Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1105021459150.18768@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <BANLkTikLpE85SiAzMD783fbmBJB2qnPSeA@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTik+TaJDqfJyO8_pJ4KsypVcS6MNJg@mail.gmail.com> <4DC81276.8040201@gnu.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1105091642500.21102@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <BANLkTikBW+fj_vP+f=Y1qnUy_=MeCbLG9w@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1105091651150.21102@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <BANLkTi=kgtAuAAYQkUDMuF+3si_VLHheUw@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTima9JKAZOWmgq=dK0SCitoeO0FJLA@mail.gmail.com> <mcrliyemz5n.fsf@coign.corp.google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <mcrliyemz5n.fsf@coign.corp.google.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00744.txt.bz2

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 07:02:44AM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > Otherwise if people link with ld they suddenly get different hash-style.
> > That looks wrong to me.
> 
> That turns out not to be the case.  Both gold and GNU ld accept the same
> set of --hash-style options.

And we keep telling people they shouldn't be invoking ld directly, they
usually don't pass correct arguments.

	Jakub