* Fix minor oversight in stack checking patch series
@ 2011-05-11 18:26 Eric Botcazou
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Eric Botcazou @ 2011-05-11 18:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 382 bytes --]
We don't need to initialize stack_check_probe_note in all cases now, but only
if the mechanism is the generic one.
Tested on i586-suse-linux, applied on the mainline as obvious.
2011-05-11 Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
* function.c (expand_function_start): Initialize stack_check_probe_note
only if the generic stack checking mechanism is used.
--
Eric Botcazou
[-- Attachment #2: p.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 608 bytes --]
Index: function.c
===================================================================
--- function.c (revision 173643)
+++ function.c (working copy)
@@ -4813,9 +4813,8 @@ expand_function_start (tree subr)
#endif
}
- /* After the display initializations is where the stack checking
- probe should go. */
- if(flag_stack_check)
+ /* If we are doing generic stack checking, the probe should go here. */
+ if (flag_stack_check == GENERIC_STACK_CHECK)
stack_check_probe_note = emit_note (NOTE_INSN_DELETED);
/* Make sure there is a line number after the function entry setup code. */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2011-05-11 15:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-05-11 18:26 Fix minor oversight in stack checking patch series Eric Botcazou
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).