From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16079 invoked by alias); 23 May 2011 10:09:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 16068 invoked by uid 22791); 23 May 2011 10:09:54 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 10:09:41 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D5B8CB0283; Mon, 23 May 2011 12:09:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WpOJRfV0Drus; Mon, 23 May 2011 12:09:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from province.act-europe.fr (province.act-europe.fr [10.10.0.214]) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76D3CB02E3; Mon, 23 May 2011 12:09:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: by province.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 525) id D9740164812; Mon, 23 May 2011 12:09:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 11:27:00 -0000 From: Arnaud Charlet To: Rainer Orth Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , Ralf Wildenhues Subject: Re: [build, ada, doc] Remove --enable-threads=gnat support Message-ID: <20110523100936.GA28260@adacore.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg01610.txt.bz2 > As Arnaud suggested with one of my --enable-threads cleanup patches, > --enable-threads=gnat is unused and can go. The following patch > implements this. > > Bootstrapped without regressions on i386-pc-solaris2.11. > > While I didn't test the other affected configurations, I hope the > changes are sufficiently obvious that this is isn't necessary. There > are no references to gthr-gnat left in the tree (outside of ChangeLog > files). > > Ok for mainline? Certainly looks good to me, although I probably can't officially approve it. Thanks for working on that! Arno