public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Froyd <froydnj@codesourcery.com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PING][PATCH 13/18] move TS_EXP to be a substructure of TS_TYPED
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 18:52:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110524173443.GA498@nightcrawler> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikb=nvMfeCQAhZ=5WjDTFpEvupn3Q@mail.gmail.com>

`0On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 04:58:06PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Nathan Froyd <froydnj@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> > On 05/17/2011 11:31 AM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> >> On 05/10/2011 04:18 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> >>> On 03/10/2011 11:23 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> >>>> After all that, we can finally make tree_exp inherit from typed_tree.
> >>>> Quite anticlimatic.
> >>>
> >>> Ping.  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg00559.html
> >>
> >> Ping^2.
> >
> > Ping^3 to put it in Richi's INBOX. ;)
> 
> Ok ;)
>
> Please check for sizeof () uses of the structs you touched sofar.
> ISTR a bug about fold-checking.

That doesn't apply here, because I'm not renaming the struct.  But I did
find some problems with LTO when I was rebootstrapping prior to
committing; not sure how I missed these the first time through, maybe I
was mistakenly compiling without LTO support.  Since we now have things
being dumped to LTO that don't have TREE_CHAIN, we need to take care to
not access TREE_CHAIN on such things, which the patch below does.

Tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.  OK to commit?

-Nathan

gcc/
	* tree.h (struct tree_exp): Inherit from struct tree_typed.
	* tree.c (initialize_tree_contains_struct): Mark TS_EXP as TS_TYPED
	instead of TS_COMMON.

gcc/lto/
	* lto.c (lto_ft_typed): New function.
	(lto_ft_common): Call it.
	(lto_ft_constructor): Likewise.
	(lto_ft_expr): Likewise.
	(lto_fixup_prevailing_decls): Check for TS_COMMON before accessing
	TREE_CHAIN.

diff --git a/gcc/lto/lto.c b/gcc/lto/lto.c
index d64ba18..1067b51 100644
--- a/gcc/lto/lto.c
+++ b/gcc/lto/lto.c
@@ -254,14 +254,20 @@ remember_with_vars (tree t)
 
 static void lto_fixup_types (tree);
 
-/* Fix up fields of a tree_common T.  */
+/* Fix up fields of a tree_typed T.  */
 
 static void
-lto_ft_common (tree t)
+lto_ft_typed (tree t)
 {
-  /* Fixup our type.  */
   LTO_FIXUP_TREE (TREE_TYPE (t));
+}
+
+/* Fix up fields of a tree_common T.  */
 
+static void
+lto_ft_common (tree t)
+{
+  lto_ft_typed (t);
   LTO_FIXUP_TREE (TREE_CHAIN (t));
 }
 
@@ -398,7 +404,7 @@ lto_ft_constructor (tree t)
   unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT idx;
   constructor_elt *ce;
 
-  LTO_FIXUP_TREE (TREE_TYPE (t));
+  lto_ft_typed (t);
 
   for (idx = 0;
        VEC_iterate(constructor_elt, CONSTRUCTOR_ELTS (t), idx, ce);
@@ -415,7 +421,7 @@ static void
 lto_ft_expr (tree t)
 {
   int i;
-  lto_ft_common (t);
+  lto_ft_typed (t);
   for (i = TREE_OPERAND_LENGTH (t) - 1; i >= 0; --i)
     LTO_FIXUP_TREE (TREE_OPERAND (t, i));
 }
@@ -2029,7 +2035,8 @@ lto_fixup_prevailing_decls (tree t)
 {
   enum tree_code code = TREE_CODE (t);
   LTO_NO_PREVAIL (TREE_TYPE (t));
-  LTO_NO_PREVAIL (TREE_CHAIN (t));
+  if (CODE_CONTAINS_STRUCT (code, TS_COMMON))
+    LTO_NO_PREVAIL (TREE_CHAIN (t));
   if (DECL_P (t))
     {
       LTO_NO_PREVAIL (DECL_NAME (t));
diff --git a/gcc/tree.c b/gcc/tree.c
index 3357d84..9cc99fe 100644
--- a/gcc/tree.c
+++ b/gcc/tree.c
@@ -380,6 +380,7 @@ initialize_tree_contains_struct (void)
 	case TS_COMPLEX:
 	case TS_SSA_NAME:
 	case TS_CONSTRUCTOR:
+	case TS_EXP:
 	  MARK_TS_TYPED (code);
 	  break;
 
@@ -388,7 +389,6 @@ initialize_tree_contains_struct (void)
 	case TS_TYPE_COMMON:
 	case TS_LIST:
 	case TS_VEC:
-	case TS_EXP:
 	case TS_BLOCK:
 	case TS_BINFO:
 	case TS_STATEMENT_LIST:
diff --git a/gcc/tree.h b/gcc/tree.h
index 805fe06..142237f 100644
--- a/gcc/tree.h
+++ b/gcc/tree.h
@@ -1917,7 +1917,7 @@ enum omp_clause_default_kind
   (OMP_CLAUSE_SUBCODE_CHECK (NODE, OMP_CLAUSE_DEFAULT)->omp_clause.subcode.default_kind)
 
 struct GTY(()) tree_exp {
-  struct tree_common common;
+  struct tree_typed typed;
   location_t locus;
   tree block;
   tree GTY ((special ("tree_exp"),

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-24 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-11  4:23 [4.7 PATCH 00/18] slim down a number of tree nodes Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11  4:23 ` [PATCH 05/18] remove TREE_CHAIN from CONSTRUCTOR nodes Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:05   ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11  4:23 ` [PATCH 04/18] remove TREE_CHAIN from SSA_NAME nodes Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:06   ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11  4:24 ` [PATCH 10/18] convert cp SWITCH_STMTs to use private scope fields Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11  4:24 ` [PATCH 15/18] move REAL_IDENTIFIER_TYPE_VALUE to be a field of lang_identifier Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:40   ` Jason Merrill
2011-03-11 14:04     ` Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 14:20       ` Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 15:04         ` Jason Merrill
2011-03-11 16:23           ` Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 17:17             ` Jason Merrill
2011-03-11 14:41     ` Joseph S. Myers
2011-03-11  4:24 ` [PATCH 01/18] add typed_tree structure Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:05   ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11 15:21   ` Michael Matz
2011-03-11  4:24 ` [PATCH 13/18] move TS_EXP to be a substructure of TS_TYPED Nathan Froyd
2011-05-11  0:34   ` Nathan Froyd
2011-05-17 17:51     ` [PING][PATCH " Nathan Froyd
2011-05-23 14:58       ` Nathan Froyd
2011-05-23 15:34         ` Richard Guenther
2011-05-24 18:52           ` Nathan Froyd [this message]
2011-05-25  9:59             ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11  4:24 ` [PATCH 08/18] convert cp *FOR_STMTs to use private scope fields Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11  4:24 ` [PATCH 06/18] define CASE_CHAIN accessor for CASE_LABEL_EXPR Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:07   ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11  4:24 ` [PATCH 14/18] move TS_STATEMENT_LIST to be a substructure of TS_TYPED Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11  6:01   ` Jason Merrill
2011-03-11 12:23     ` Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11  4:24 ` [PATCH 07/18] generalize build_case_label to the rest of the compiler Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:01   ` Joseph S. Myers
2011-03-11 13:10     ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11 14:56   ` Tom Tromey
2011-03-11  4:24 ` [PATCH 03/18] remove TREE_CHAIN from *_CST nodes Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:05   ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11  4:24 ` [PATCH 16/18] make TS_IDENTIFIER be a substructure of TS_BASE Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:12   ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11 17:21     ` Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11  4:30 ` [PATCH 11/18] mark EXPR_PACK_EXPANSION as typed only Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11  4:30 ` [PATCH 09/18] convert cp IF_STMTs to use private scope fields Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11  4:31 ` [PATCH 17/18] introduce block_chainon and use BLOCK_CHAIN more Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:15   ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11 13:19     ` Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 15:14   ` Tom Tromey
2011-03-12 12:23   ` Eric Botcazou
2011-03-11  4:31 ` [PATCH 18/18] make TS_BLOCK a substructure of TS_BASE Nathan Froyd
2011-05-26 18:30   ` Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11  4:31 ` [PATCH 02/18] enforce TREE_CHAIN and TREE_TYPE accesses Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11  8:12   ` Mike Stump
2011-03-11 13:21   ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11 15:24   ` Tom Tromey
2011-03-12 12:13   ` Eric Botcazou
2011-03-21 13:50     ` Nathan Froyd
2011-03-21 17:50       ` Eric Botcazou
2011-04-13  2:43   ` Nathan Froyd
2011-04-13  2:57     ` Diego Novillo
2011-04-13  4:02     ` Ian Lance Taylor
2011-03-11  4:50 ` [PATCH 12/18] make CASE_LABEL_EXPR not abuse TREE_CHAIN Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:19   ` Richard Guenther
2011-05-10 20:08     ` Nathan Froyd
2011-05-10 20:19     ` Diego Novillo
2011-05-11  9:21       ` Richard Guenther
2011-05-11 19:22   ` H.J. Lu
2011-03-11  8:18 ` [4.7 PATCH 00/18] slim down a number of tree nodes Mike Stump
2011-03-11 16:00   ` Nathan Froyd
2011-03-11 13:25 ` Richard Guenther
2011-03-11 13:42   ` Nathan Froyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110524173443.GA498@nightcrawler \
    --to=froydnj@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).