From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-293422-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 27664 invoked by alias); 1 Jun 2011 21:12:21 -0000
Received: (qmail 27656 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jun 2011 21:12:21 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_DYNAMIC,TVD_RCVD_IP
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from 195-14-0-142.nuxit.net (HELO de558.ispfr.net) (195.14.0.142)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 21:12:07 +0000
Received: from ours.starynkevitch.net ([213.41.244.95] helo=glinka.lesours)	by de558.ispfr.net with smtp (Exim 4.72)	(envelope-from <basile@starynkevitch.net>)	id 1QRshv-0001Nk-K3; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 23:12:03 +0200
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 21:12:00 -0000
From: Basile Starynkevitch <basile@starynkevitch.net>
To: Xinliang David Li <davidxl@google.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Dump before flag
Message-Id: <20110601231202.224188ad.basile@starynkevitch.net>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTim89r_RsLCqYjuWZMA=9Lic_4UXThZ2JJM--ajYb8epew@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTim89r_RsLCqYjuWZMA=9Lic_4UXThZ2JJM--ajYb8epew@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00107.txt.bz2

On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 13:26:24 -0700
Xinliang David Li <davidxl@google.com> wrote:

> Hi, this is a simple patch that support dump_before flag. E.g,
> 
> -fdump-tree-pre-before
> 
> This is useful for diffing the the IR before and after a pass.

Perhaps you forgot to actually attach the patch?

> Gcc dumping needs more cleanups -- such as allowing IR only dump,
> allowing IR dumping for a particular function etc. The exposure of
> 'dumpfile' (instead of a dumping_level () function) makes those change
> a little messy, but can be done.

I don't understand what you mean by a dumping_level () function. What
should that hypothetical function do? (I'm wrongly guessing it would
return an integer, but IIRC dumpfile is a FILE*)

Regards

-- 
Basile STARYNKEVITCH         http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France
*** opinions {are only mine, sont seulement les miennes} ***