From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25050 invoked by alias); 2 Jun 2011 16:49:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 25041 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Jun 2011 16:49:05 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_ZM,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 16:48:49 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p52GmmQY024590 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:48:48 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (ovpn-113-137.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.137]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p52Gmivs023511 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:48:47 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by greed.delorie.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p52GmfxJ020872 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:48:41 -0400 Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p52GmfqL020871; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:48:41 -0400 Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 16:49:00 -0000 Message-Id: <201106021648.p52GmfqL020871@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org In-reply-to: <201008100348.o7A3mVG7009468@greed.delorie.com> (message from DJ Delorie on Mon, 9 Aug 2010 23:48:31 -0400) Subject: Re: [patch] testsuite: support board_info timeouts References: <201008100348.o7A3mVG7009468@greed.delorie.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00166.txt.bz2 I never got feedback from the testsuite maintainers on this one... > Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 23:48:31 -0400 > From: DJ Delorie > Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm > > > Is there any reason why we don't support board-level timeouts? It's > really hard to specify timeouts for sid-based embedded targets with > lots of multilibs (or just one, sometimes). > > It's certainly better than "really REALLY ugly" which is the only > other option at that point. > > * lib/timeout.exp (timeout): Add board_info support. > > 2010-08-09 Thomas Koenig > Index: lib/timeout.exp > =================================================================== > --- lib/timeout.exp (revision 163048) > +++ lib/timeout.exp (working copy) > @@ -43,12 +43,14 @@ proc timeout_value { args } { > if [info exists individual_timeout] { > set val $individual_timeout > } elseif [info exists tool_timeout] { > set val $tool_timeout > } elseif [target_info exists gcc,timeout] { > set val [target_info gcc,timeout] > + } elseif [board_info target exists gcc,timeout] { > + set val [board_info target gcc,timeout] > } else { > # This is really, REALLY ugly, but this is the default from > # remote.exp deep within DejaGnu. > set val 300 > } > >