From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28145 invoked by alias); 3 Jun 2011 18:26:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 28137 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jun 2011 18:26:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:26:39 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p53IQXdO011828 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:26:33 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (ovpn-113-137.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.137]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p53IQWMV007304 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:26:33 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (greed.delorie.com [127.0.0.1]) by greed.delorie.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p53IQV6k030200; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:26:31 -0400 Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p53IQVu8030199; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:26:31 -0400 Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:26:00 -0000 Message-Id: <201106031826.p53IQVu8030199@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: Jing Yu CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, joseph@codesourcery.com, joey.ye.cc@gmail.com In-reply-to: (message from Jing Yu on Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:21:24 -0700) Subject: Re: Ping:Re: Skip building target libiberty for arm*-*-linux-androideabi References: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00269.txt.bz2 > Ping. > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg02208.html > > > I don't have the bandwidth to work on the ideal patch. Thus I am > > wondering if we can skip target-libiberty for androideabi target > > before the ideal patch is out. Target-specific changes in the build are up to the target maintainers.