From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-294260-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 619 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2011 15:08:37 -0000
Received: (qmail 609 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jun 2011 15:08:36 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz (HELO nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz) (195.113.20.16)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:08:20 +0000
Received: by nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix, from userid 16202)	id 2993A9AC81D; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:08:19 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:55:00 -0000
From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Cgraph alias reorg 15/14 (New infrastructure for same body	aliases)
Message-ID: <20110612150819.GB19441@kam.mff.cuni.cz>
References: <20110611125552.GA25068@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <BANLkTim23fOqkBS+QKfmmpExBrAXfTNdAw@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTik8zti5+FwGHX=j3_MKqEgAgxPZAA@mail.gmail.com> <20110612145443.GA7920@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <BANLkTimpPtQfbrLPNgqh_WSSNq-VRPEpuQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimpPtQfbrLPNgqh_WSSNq-VRPEpuQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00945.txt.bz2

> I am testing it now.  Will know the results in 2 hours.
Thanks.
Could you also send me the preprocessed source for future.o?  The object file I
am getting don't have the bug you report, that is most probably due to glibc
difference.

Honza
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> H.J.