From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14038 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2011 15:00:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 14030 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jun 2011 15:00:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:00:21 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF7ADCB01D3; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:00:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p0GLXUIwE1ak; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:00:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (bon31-9-83-155-120-49.fbx.proxad.net [83.155.120.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8693CCB0392; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:00:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Eric Botcazou To: Richard Guenther Subject: Re: Cgraph alias reorg 13/14 (disable inlining functions called once at -O0 Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:10:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Jan Hubicka References: <20110610184247.GA3252@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20110610191500.GA14895@kam.mff.cuni.cz> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201106141700.04253.ebotcazou@adacore.com> Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg01058.txt.bz2 > I think we also suggested at some point that -O1 optimizations > shouldn't interfere with debugging too much. But if it is what we did before > it's certainly fine. FWIW we have some evidences that -finline-functions-called-once really help at -O1 in terms of performances (with the 4.5 back-end) and doesn't damage debugging too much. -- Eric Botcazou