From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30160 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2011 07:17:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 30135 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jun 2011 07:17:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FAKE_REPLY_C,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (HELO outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de) (130.133.4.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 07:17:23 +0000 Received: from relay1.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.67]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1QX6pN-0000tN-JG>; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:17:21 +0200 Received: from mx.physik.fu-berlin.de ([160.45.64.218]) by relay1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1QX6pN-0000bl-FD>; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:17:21 +0200 Received: from lenny32.physik.fu-berlin.de ([160.45.66.36]) by mx.physik.fu-berlin.de with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QX6pN-0003uZ-8p; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:17:21 +0200 Received: from tburnus by lenny32.physik.fu-berlin.de with local (Exim 4.69 #1 (Debian)) id 1QX6pN-0007ji-1o; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:17:21 +0200 Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 07:24:00 -0000 From: Tobias Burnus To: Janus Weil , fortran@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran, OOP] PR 49417: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE on invalid CLASS component declaration Message-ID: <20110616071720.GA29720@physik.fu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg01208.txt.bz2 Janus Weil wrote: > here is the fix for an OOP-regression reported today by Andrew Benson > > The patch was regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Ok for trunk? The patch is OK - thanks for the quick fix. Do you plan to also backport it to 4.6, given that it is a regression? Tobias