From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12731 invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2011 14:47:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 12717 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jun 2011 14:47:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:47:06 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5KEl5Qq007905 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:47:05 -0400 Received: from tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com (tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com [10.16.42.4]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p5KEl44A000382 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:47:05 -0400 Received: from tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5KEl4u7017814; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:47:04 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p5KEl481017808; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:47:04 +0200 Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:04:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: NightStrike Cc: Kai Tietz , Richard Guenther , GCC Patches Subject: Re: [patch fold-const.c]: Add some missing optimizations about binary and and truth-not Message-ID: <20110620144703.GE16443@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <20110620120640.GC16443@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg01488.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:37:30AM -0400, NightStrike wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 01:50:26PM +0200, Kai Tietz wrote: > >> Applied at revision 175206 to trunk. > > > > There is no need to post such notices to gcc-patches, we have the gcc-cvs > > mailing list where this is automatically posted to. > > On gcc-patches it just adds unnecessary noise. > > Until there is some way to easily map an email on gcc-patches to an > email on gcc-cvs, or a legitimate patch tracker instead of just > mailing lists, then it is very useful "noise". I've found at least a > hundred dropped patches so far for our project alone. You can always > just delete the email instead of reading it. No, our guidelines say that such mails shouldn't be sent: http://gcc.gnu.org/svnwrite.html "When you have checked in a patch exactly as it has been approved, you do not need to tell that to people -- including the approver. People interested in when a particular patch is committed can check SVN or the gcc-cvs list." This has been discussed several times. So no, this noise isn't at all useful nor welcome. Jakub