From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18353 invoked by alias); 28 Jun 2011 17:48:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 18344 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jun 2011 17:48:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,TW_BG X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:48:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25224CB029A; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:48:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s978t2lX8t5f; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:48:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (bon31-9-83-155-120-49.fbx.proxad.net [83.155.120.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6AD1CB0294; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:48:07 +0200 (CEST) From: Eric Botcazou To: Rainer Orth Subject: Re: Simplify Solaris configuration Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:02:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <201106272002.35694.ebotcazou@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201106281947.39485.ebotcazou@adacore.com> Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg02163.txt.bz2 > The patch allowed a sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11 bootstrap to run well into > building the target libraries (failed configuring libgfortran since I'd > mis-merged the 32-bit and 64-bit gmp.h), a sparc-sun-solaris2.10 > bootstrap is still running. > > I'll probably fix the gmp.h issue, rebuild the sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11 > configuration and commit unless I find problems or you disapprove of the > approach. No, this is fine by me, thanks. -- Eric Botcazou