public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix dead_debug_insert_before ICE (PR debug/49522)
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 20:12:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110705200651.GG2687@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201107051035.12061.ebotcazou@adacore.com>

On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 10:35:11AM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > There are two kinds of changes we do on the debug insns without immediate
> > rescanning:
> > 1) reset the debug insn
> > 2) replace a reg use with DEBUG_EXPR of the same mode or
> >    subreg of a larger DEBUG_EXPR with the same outer mode as the reg
> >
> > In the attached testcase on arm a debug insn is reset, because a multi-reg
> > register has been used there and as the debug insn location was that
> > multi-reg register before, it is now VOIDmode after the reset - (clobber
> > (const_int 0)).
> 
> That can happen only in this case, right?  Otherwise, for a single register, 
> the debug insn would have been removed from debug->head already.  If so, how 
> simpler would it be to remove the other uses in dead_debug_reset instead?

So you prefer something like this (untested) instead?
Without the second loop I have no idea how to make it work in
dead_debug_reset, the other dead_debug_use referencing the same insn might
be earlier or later in the chain.

--- gcc/df-problems.c	2011-07-04 19:17:50.757435754 +0200
+++ gcc/df-problems.c	2011-07-05 22:04:19.817464710 +0200
@@ -3117,6 +3117,25 @@ dead_debug_reset (struct dead_debug *deb
       else
 	tailp = &(*tailp)->next;
     }
+
+  /* If any other dead_debug_use structs refer to the debug insns
+     that have been reset above, remove them too.  */
+  if (debug->to_rescan != NULL)
+    {
+      tailp = &debug->head;
+      while ((cur = *tailp))
+	{
+	  insn = DF_REF_INSN (cur->use);
+	  if (bitmap_bit_p (debug->to_rescan, INSN_UID (insn))
+	      && VAR_LOC_UNKNOWN_P (INSN_VAR_LOCATION_LOC (insn)))
+	    {
+	      *tailp = cur->next;
+	      XDELETE (cur);
+	    }
+	  else
+	    tailp = &(*tailp)->next;
+	}
+    }
 }
 
 /* Add USE to DEBUG.  It must be a dead reference to UREGNO in a debug


	Jakub

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-05 20:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-04 17:29 Jakub Jelinek
2011-07-05  8:51 ` Eric Botcazou
2011-07-05 20:12   ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2011-07-06 19:48     ` [PATCH] Fix dead_debug_insert_before ICE (PR debug/49522, take 2) Jakub Jelinek
2011-07-06 20:55       ` Eric Botcazou
2011-07-07 10:27         ` [PATCH] Fix dead_debug_insert_before ICE (PR debug/49522, take 3) Jakub Jelinek
2011-07-07 15:53           ` Eric Botcazou
2011-07-06 20:36     ` [PATCH] Fix dead_debug_insert_before ICE (PR debug/49522) Eric Botcazou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110705200651.GG2687@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebotcazou@adacore.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).