From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20359 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2011 00:49:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 20351 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Sep 2011 00:49:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-yi0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-yi0-f47.google.com) (209.85.218.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:49:14 +0000 Received: by yia27 with SMTP id 27so5370954yia.20 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:49:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.139.40 with SMTP id r40mr6624222ann.53.1317084553732; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:49:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bubble.grove.modra.org ([115.187.252.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z6sm73697588anf.22.2011.09.26.17.49.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:49:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by bubble.grove.modra.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 52E07170C2BC; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:19:06 +0930 (CST) Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 02:16:00 -0000 From: Alan Modra To: Bernd Schmidt Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Richard Henderson Subject: Re: PowerPC shrink-wrap support 3 of 3 Message-ID: <20110927004906.GN10321@bubble.grove.modra.org> Mail-Followup-To: Bernd Schmidt , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Richard Henderson References: <20110917071643.GT10321@bubble.grove.modra.org> <20110917071914.GW10321@bubble.grove.modra.org> <20110926135254.GJ10321@bubble.grove.modra.org> <20110926223241.GL10321@bubble.grove.modra.org> <4E80FF28.2070509@codesourcery.com> <20110927001120.GM10321@bubble.grove.modra.org> <4E81159C.8090503@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E81159C.8090503@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-09/txt/msg01671.txt.bz2 On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 02:15:24AM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > That looks perfectly reasonable, and even if it is ordered in the way > shown above, dwarf2cfi still should be able to deal with it if the > prologue and epilogue are annotated correctly. Here I was thinking that it was someone else's problem. :-) I looked at this before and saw some epilogue cfa_restores, but I see now we're missing some for -m64. More work needed in rs6000_emit_epilogue.. Sorry for the noise. -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM