[google] Backport r178628 from trunk to google/gcc-4_6 (issue5139050)

[google] Backport r178628 from trunk to google/gcc-4_6 (issue5139050)

[Guozhi Wei]

Hi

This patch removes the XPASS of test case 20040204-1.c on arm.

Tested by
on arm: make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=arm-sim/thumb/arch=armv7-a tree-ssa.exp=20040204-1.c"
on x86_64: make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="tree-ssa.exp=20040204-1.c"

OK for google/gcc-4_6?

thanks
Carrot


2011-09-27  Guozhi Wei  <carrot@google.com>

	2011-09-07  Jiangning Liu  <jiangning.liu@arm.com>

		PR tree-optimization/46021
		* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c: Don't XFAIL on arm*-*-*.


Index: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c
===================================================================
--- gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c	(revision 179225)
+++ gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c	(working copy)
@@ -33,5 +33,5 @@ void test55 (int x, int y)
    that the && should be emitted (based on BRANCH_COST).  Fix this
    by teaching dom to look through && and register all components
    as true.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "link_error" 0 "optimized" { xfail { ! "alpha*-*-* powerpc*-*-* cris-*-* crisv32-*-* hppa*-*-* i?86-*-* mmix-*-* mips*-*-* m68k*-*-* moxie-*-* sparc*-*-* spu-*-* x86_64-*-*" } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "link_error" 0 "optimized" { xfail { ! "alpha*-*-* arm*-*-* powerpc*-*-* cris-*-* crisv32-*-* hppa*-*-* i?86-*-* mmix-*-* mips*-*-* m68k*-*-* moxie-*-* sparc*-*-* spu-*-* x86_64-*-*" } } } } */
 /* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "optimized" } } */

--
This patch is available for review at http://codereview.appspot.com/5139050

Re: [google] Backport r178628 from trunk to google/gcc-4_6 (issue5139050)

[Doug Kwan (關振德)]

This is okay

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Guozhi Wei <carrot@google.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> This patch removes the XPASS of test case 20040204-1.c on arm.
>
> Tested by
> on arm: make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=arm-sim/thumb/arch=armv7-a tree-ssa.exp=20040204-1.c"
> on x86_64: make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="tree-ssa.exp=20040204-1.c"
>
> OK for google/gcc-4_6?
>
> thanks
> Carrot
>
>
> 2011-09-27  Guozhi Wei  <carrot@google.com>
>
>        2011-09-07  Jiangning Liu  <jiangning.liu@arm.com>
>
>                PR tree-optimization/46021
>                * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c: Don't XFAIL on arm*-*-*.
>
>
> Index: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c        (revision 179225)
> +++ gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c        (working copy)
> @@ -33,5 +33,5 @@ void test55 (int x, int y)
>    that the && should be emitted (based on BRANCH_COST).  Fix this
>    by teaching dom to look through && and register all components
>    as true.  */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "link_error" 0 "optimized" { xfail { ! "alpha*-*-* powerpc*-*-* cris-*-* crisv32-*-* hppa*-*-* i?86-*-* mmix-*-* mips*-*-* m68k*-*-* moxie-*-* sparc*-*-* spu-*-* x86_64-*-*" } } } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "link_error" 0 "optimized" { xfail { ! "alpha*-*-* arm*-*-* powerpc*-*-* cris-*-* crisv32-*-* hppa*-*-* i?86-*-* mmix-*-* mips*-*-* m68k*-*-* moxie-*-* sparc*-*-* spu-*-* x86_64-*-*" } } } } */
>  /* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "optimized" } } */
>
> --
> This patch is available for review at http://codereview.appspot.com/5139050
>