From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19869 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2011 01:15:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 19859 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Sep 2011 01:15:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (74.125.121.67) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 01:15:02 +0000 Received: from hpaq7.eem.corp.google.com (hpaq7.eem.corp.google.com [172.25.149.7]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p8R1F0wp001369; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:15:00 -0700 Received: from guozhiwei.sha.corp.google.com (guozhiwei.sha.corp.google.com [172.30.123.48]) by hpaq7.eem.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p8R1Ew1o016618; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:14:59 -0700 Received: by guozhiwei.sha.corp.google.com (Postfix, from userid 68690) id 993AF20A09; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:14:56 +0800 (CST) To: reply@codereview.appspotmail.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [google] Backport r178628 from trunk to google/gcc-4_6 (issue5139050) Message-Id: <20110927011456.993AF20A09@guozhiwei.sha.corp.google.com> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 02:37:00 -0000 From: carrot@google.com (Guozhi Wei) X-System-Of-Record: true X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-09/txt/msg01673.txt.bz2 Hi This patch removes the XPASS of test case 20040204-1.c on arm. Tested by on arm: make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=arm-sim/thumb/arch=armv7-a tree-ssa.exp=20040204-1.c" on x86_64: make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="tree-ssa.exp=20040204-1.c" OK for google/gcc-4_6? thanks Carrot 2011-09-27 Guozhi Wei 2011-09-07 Jiangning Liu PR tree-optimization/46021 * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c: Don't XFAIL on arm*-*-*. Index: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c =================================================================== --- gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c (revision 179225) +++ gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c (working copy) @@ -33,5 +33,5 @@ void test55 (int x, int y) that the && should be emitted (based on BRANCH_COST). Fix this by teaching dom to look through && and register all components as true. */ -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "link_error" 0 "optimized" { xfail { ! "alpha*-*-* powerpc*-*-* cris-*-* crisv32-*-* hppa*-*-* i?86-*-* mmix-*-* mips*-*-* m68k*-*-* moxie-*-* sparc*-*-* spu-*-* x86_64-*-*" } } } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "link_error" 0 "optimized" { xfail { ! "alpha*-*-* arm*-*-* powerpc*-*-* cris-*-* crisv32-*-* hppa*-*-* i?86-*-* mmix-*-* mips*-*-* m68k*-*-* moxie-*-* sparc*-*-* spu-*-* x86_64-*-*" } } } } */ /* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "optimized" } } */ -- This patch is available for review at http://codereview.appspot.com/5139050