public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter.nilsson@axis.com>
To: hubicka@ucw.cz
Cc: ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE, developer@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk,
	  hubicka@ucw.cz, hp@axis.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [RFA:] fix breakage with "Update testsuite to run with slim LTO"
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:40:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201110211620.p9LGK2HU026848@ignucius.se.axis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111021154414.GC18476@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> (message from	Jan Hubicka on Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:44:15 +0200)

> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:44:15 +0200
> From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>

> I also noticed that tests scanning output of late optimization passes are
> now getting UNRESOLVED state with slim LTO.  We don't really lose coverage
> here because we test fat LTO with the other compilation, but probably easiest
> is to enfore fat LTO all the time.
> 
> Does the following seem resonable?
> 
> Honza
> 
> 	* gcc.dg/torture/pta-ptrarith-1.c: Force fat LTO.
> 	* gcc.dg/torture/pta-ptrarith-2.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.dg/torture/pr23821.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.dg/torture/pta-ptrarith-3.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.dg/torture/pr45704.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.dg/torture/pr50472.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.dg/torture/ipa-pta-1.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.dg/torture/pta-callused-1.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.dg/torture/pr39074-2.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.dg/torture/pr39074.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.dg/torture/pr42898-2.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.dg/torture/pr42898.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.dg/torture/pta-escape-1.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.dg/torture/ssa-pta-fn-1.c: Likewise.

Meh...  Please no, this was the kind of scatter-patches my patch
aimed to avoid... for example, easy to miss some tests.

Instead, on top of my patch, just copy the
scan-assembler_required_options proc to a
scan-tree-dump_required_options.  ...no wait, should forcing
fat-lto be done for all tree-dumps?  If only for a subset of
tree-dumps augment the *_required_options proc API to take
arguments that let you check for that.

brgds, H-P

  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-21 16:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-27 17:54 Update testsuite to run with slim LTO Jan Hubicka
2011-09-30 14:56 ` Diego Novillo
2011-10-20 19:34 ` Breakage with "Update testsuite to run with slim LTO" Hans-Peter Nilsson
2011-10-20 19:53   ` Andi Kleen
2011-10-21  0:39   ` Jan Hubicka
2011-10-21  5:22     ` [RFA:] fix breakage " Hans-Peter Nilsson
2011-10-21  9:58       ` Jan Hubicka
2011-10-21 12:23         ` Iain Sandoe
2011-10-21 12:35           ` Rainer Orth
2011-10-21 16:20             ` Jan Hubicka
2011-10-21 17:40               ` Hans-Peter Nilsson [this message]
2011-10-21 18:52                 ` Jan Hubicka
2011-10-21 19:56                   ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2011-10-24 12:08             ` Richard Guenther
2011-10-28 14:59       ` ping: [RFA:] testsuite infrastructure for options implied by dg-final methods Hans-Peter Nilsson
2011-11-04 13:56         ` ping*2: " Hans-Peter Nilsson
2011-11-04 17:05           ` Mike Stump
2011-11-04 17:54             ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2011-11-04 18:14               ` Mike Stump
2011-11-04 18:16                 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2023-05-03 11:16 ` Let each 'lto_init' determine the default 'LTO_OPTIONS', and 'torture-init' the 'LTO_TORTURE_OPTIONS' (was: Update testsuite to run with slim LTO) Thomas Schwinge
2023-05-03 11:46   ` Richard Biener
2023-05-09  7:32     ` Christophe Lyon
2023-05-09  9:00       ` Testsuite: Add missing 'torture-init'/'torture-finish' around 'LTO_TORTURE_OPTIONS' usage (was: Let each 'lto_init' determine the default 'LTO_OPTIONS', and 'torture-init' the 'LTO_TORTURE_OPTIONS') Thomas Schwinge
2023-05-09 15:17         ` Christophe Lyon
2023-05-09 19:14           ` Christophe Lyon
2023-05-10  7:51             ` Testsuite: Add 'torture-init-done', and use it to conditionalize implicit 'torture-init' (was: Testsuite: Add missing 'torture-init'/'torture-finish' around 'LTO_TORTURE_OPTIONS' usage (was: Let each 'lto_init' determine the default 'LTO_OPTIONS', and 'torture-init' the 'LTO_TORTURE_OPTIONS')) Thomas Schwinge
2023-05-10 13:42               ` Christophe Lyon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201110211620.p9LGK2HU026848@ignucius.se.axis.com \
    --to=hans-peter.nilsson@axis.com \
    --cc=developer@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hp@axis.com \
    --cc=hubicka@ucw.cz \
    --cc=ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).