From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22770 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2011 19:29:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 22760 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Oct 2011 19:29:52 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from anubis.se.axis.com (HELO anubis.se.axis.com) (195.60.68.12) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 19:29:30 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by anubis.se.axis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B92119DC9; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:29:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from anubis.se.axis.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (anubis.se.axis.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id fRg1OQ0H8CIf; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:29:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from thoth.se.axis.com (thoth.se.axis.com [10.0.2.173]) by anubis.se.axis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E3A19D99; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:29:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ignucius.se.axis.com (ignucius.se.axis.com [10.88.21.50]) by thoth.se.axis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80D0734160; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:29:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ignucius.se.axis.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ignucius.se.axis.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Debian-2woody1) with ESMTP id p9LJTMF6030329; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:29:22 +0200 Received: (from hp@localhost) by ignucius.se.axis.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Debian-2woody1) id p9LJTLfn030325; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:29:21 +0200 Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 19:56:00 -0000 Message-Id: <201110211929.p9LJTLfn030325@ignucius.se.axis.com> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson To: hubicka@ucw.cz CC: hp@axis.com, hubicka@ucw.cz, ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE, developer@sandoe-acoustics.co.uk, hp@axis.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org In-reply-to: <20111021183405.GA23739@kam.mff.cuni.cz> (message from Jan Hubicka on Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:34:05 +0200) Subject: Re: [RFA:] fix breakage with "Update testsuite to run with slim LTO" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg02029.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:34:05 +0200 > From: Jan Hubicka > I guess we could make ipa-dump/rtl-dump/tree-dump scanning to disable fat lto > and introduce variants intended to scan late tree dumps and ipa execution dumps... Ok, sounds like a plan. Are there any such scan-tests-with-late-thin-lto at present? > Not sure if it would make more sense than just doing it > explicitely in tests. Depends on the number of tests there'll eventually be; I just see it as strictly increasing and even now a bit above break-even for improving the machinery instead of patching separate tests. BTW, was your ok approval or do I need ok from a testsuite maintainer? brgds, H-P