From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10163 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2011 00:22:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 10155 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Nov 2011 00:22:41 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 00:22:22 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pA30ML9x026439 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 2 Nov 2011 20:22:21 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com ([10.3.113.14]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pA30MKNn016116 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Nov 2011 20:22:21 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (greed.delorie.com [127.0.0.1]) by greed.delorie.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pA30MImJ017770; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 20:22:18 -0400 Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id pA30MIrs017769; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 20:22:18 -0400 Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 00:32:00 -0000 Message-Id: <201111030022.pA30MIrs017769@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: Hans-Peter Nilsson CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from Hans-Peter Nilsson on Wed, 2 Nov 2011 03:39:11 -0400 (EDT)) Subject: Re: New port: Renesas RL78 References: <201111020402.pA242Fb1029448@greed.delorie.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00260.txt.bz2 > Wouldn't some tools behave better if the asm files had ELF > decorations on the functions? If you mean .type and .size, I added those.