public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter.nilsson@axis.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE, mikestump@comcast.net
Subject: ping*2: [RFA:] testsuite infrastructure for options implied by dg-final methods
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 13:56:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201111041347.pA4Dla6n030692@ignucius.se.axis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201110281434.p9SEY70I018869@ignucius.se.axis.com> (message from	Hans-Peter Nilsson on Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:34:07 +0200)

Ping again, CC:ing testsuite maintainers.

Honza thought this was a good idea, if that helps.

> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@axis.com>
> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:34:07 +0200

> Subject changed from '[RFA:] fix breakage with "Update testsuite
> to run with slim LTO"' except it doesn't fix *all* breakage
> introduced by that patch, only the one I observed and intended
> to fix.
> 
> > Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 04:29:20 +0200
> > From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@axis.com>
> 
> > > Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:19:32 +0200
> > > From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
> > > Yes, if we scan assembler, we likely want -fno-fat-lto-objects.
> > 
> > > > then IIUC you need to patch *all* torture tests that use
> > > > scan-assembler and scan-assembler-not.  Alternatively, patch
> > > > somewhere else, like not passing it if certain directives are
> > > > used, like scan-assembler{,-not}.  And either way, is it safe to
> > > > add that option always, not just when also passing "-flto" or
> > > > something?
> > > 
> > > Hmm, some of assembler scans still works because they check for
> > > presence of symbols we output anyway, but indeed, it would make more
> > > sense to automatically imply -ffat-lto-object when scan-assembler
> > > is used.  I am not sure if my dejagnu skill as on par here however.
> > 
> > Maybe you could make amends ;) by testing the following, which
> > seems to work at least for dg-torture.exp and cris-elf/cris-sim,
> > in which -ffat-lto-object is automatically added for each
> > scan-assembler and scan-assembler-not test, extensible for other
> > dg-final actions without polluting with checking LTO options and
> > whatnot across the files.  I checked (and corrected) so it also
> > works when !check_effective_target_lto by commenting out the
> > setting in the second chunk.
> > 
> > gcc/testsuite:
> > 
> > 	* lib/gcc-dg.exp (gcc_force_conventional_output): New global
> > 	variable, default empty, -ffat-lto-objects for effective_target_lto.
> > 	(gcc-dg-test-1): Add options from dg-final methods.
> > 	* lib/scanasm.exp (scan-assembler_required_options)
> > 	(scan-assembler-not_required_options): New procs.
> 
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg01917.html>
> Ok to commit?
> 
> brgds, H-P
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-04 13:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-27 17:54 Update testsuite to run with slim LTO Jan Hubicka
2011-09-30 14:56 ` Diego Novillo
2011-10-20 19:34 ` Breakage with "Update testsuite to run with slim LTO" Hans-Peter Nilsson
2011-10-20 19:53   ` Andi Kleen
2011-10-21  0:39   ` Jan Hubicka
2011-10-21  5:22     ` [RFA:] fix breakage " Hans-Peter Nilsson
2011-10-21  9:58       ` Jan Hubicka
2011-10-21 12:23         ` Iain Sandoe
2011-10-21 12:35           ` Rainer Orth
2011-10-21 16:20             ` Jan Hubicka
2011-10-21 17:40               ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2011-10-21 18:52                 ` Jan Hubicka
2011-10-21 19:56                   ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2011-10-24 12:08             ` Richard Guenther
2011-10-28 14:59       ` ping: [RFA:] testsuite infrastructure for options implied by dg-final methods Hans-Peter Nilsson
2011-11-04 13:56         ` Hans-Peter Nilsson [this message]
2011-11-04 17:05           ` ping*2: " Mike Stump
2011-11-04 17:54             ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2011-11-04 18:14               ` Mike Stump
2011-11-04 18:16                 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2023-05-03 11:16 ` Let each 'lto_init' determine the default 'LTO_OPTIONS', and 'torture-init' the 'LTO_TORTURE_OPTIONS' (was: Update testsuite to run with slim LTO) Thomas Schwinge
2023-05-03 11:46   ` Richard Biener
2023-05-09  7:32     ` Christophe Lyon
2023-05-09  9:00       ` Testsuite: Add missing 'torture-init'/'torture-finish' around 'LTO_TORTURE_OPTIONS' usage (was: Let each 'lto_init' determine the default 'LTO_OPTIONS', and 'torture-init' the 'LTO_TORTURE_OPTIONS') Thomas Schwinge
2023-05-09 15:17         ` Christophe Lyon
2023-05-09 19:14           ` Christophe Lyon
2023-05-10  7:51             ` Testsuite: Add 'torture-init-done', and use it to conditionalize implicit 'torture-init' (was: Testsuite: Add missing 'torture-init'/'torture-finish' around 'LTO_TORTURE_OPTIONS' usage (was: Let each 'lto_init' determine the default 'LTO_OPTIONS', and 'torture-init' the 'LTO_TORTURE_OPTIONS')) Thomas Schwinge
2023-05-10 13:42               ` Christophe Lyon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201111041347.pA4Dla6n030692@ignucius.se.axis.com \
    --to=hans-peter.nilsson@axis.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=mikestump@comcast.net \
    --cc=ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).