From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5964 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2011 21:45:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 5898 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Nov 2011 21:45:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 21:45:13 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pA7LjD3U032616 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 16:45:13 -0500 Received: from tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com (tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com [10.16.42.4]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pA7LjC7w008002 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 16:45:13 -0500 Received: from tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com (tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com [127.0.0.1]) by tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pA7LjCVZ013648 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 22:45:12 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id pA7LjBKl013647 for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 22:45:11 +0100 Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 21:54:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Patch ping Message-ID: <20111107214511.GP27375@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg01073.txt.bz2 Hi! I'd like to ping the restrict_based_on_field attribute patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg00135.html We currently don't do cast restricts and even if we do them again, as this attribute doesn't make the type __restrict it wouldn't affect those, it only affects parameters, if they are __restrict themselves what they point to, and global vars. IMHO it would be a pitty not to improve generated code for std::vector for 4.7. Jakub