From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
To: Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
Cc: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PRs 52080, 52097 and 48124, rewrite bitfield expansion, enable the C++ memory model wrt bitfields everywhere
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 08:39:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201203271038.32329.ebotcazou@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1203270948230.5416@jbgna.fhfr.qr>
> I see. Though the code does not affect layout but only access "layout"
> for bitfields. I'm fine with fixing the issues we run into elsewhere,
> just the langhook is a possibility I had in mind from the start, in
> case frontends differ in their memory model for bitfields.
Understood. According to our internal testing, the issue we're discussing was
the last problem introduced by the bitfield change, and I think that using the
C/C++ model for C/C++-compatible bit fields is fine for GNAT.
May I apply the patch I posted? It boostrapped/regtested fine on x86-64/Linux.
--
Eric Botcazou
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-27 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-05 13:26 Richard Guenther
2012-03-09 9:02 ` Eric Botcazou
2012-03-12 9:38 ` Richard Guenther
2012-03-12 10:21 ` Eric Botcazou
2012-03-13 14:19 ` Richard Guenther
2012-03-15 14:43 ` Eric Botcazou
2012-03-15 14:58 ` Richard Guenther
2012-03-15 15:30 ` Richard Guenther
2012-03-15 16:19 ` Eric Botcazou
2012-03-15 17:03 ` Eric Botcazou
2012-03-16 9:42 ` Richard Guenther
2012-03-19 10:45 ` Eric Botcazou
2012-03-19 13:14 ` Richard Guenther
2012-03-20 9:30 ` Richard Guenther
2012-03-22 10:26 ` Eric Botcazou
2012-03-22 10:38 ` Richard Guenther
2012-03-22 11:13 ` Eric Botcazou
2012-03-22 11:22 ` Richard Guenther
2012-03-22 11:48 ` Eric Botcazou
2012-03-22 12:04 ` Richard Guenther
2012-03-22 12:18 ` Eric Botcazou
2012-03-22 12:39 ` Richard Guenther
2012-03-23 9:13 ` Richard Guenther
2012-03-26 7:18 ` Eric Botcazou
2012-03-26 7:37 ` Richard Guenther
2012-03-26 7:43 ` Eric Botcazou
2012-03-26 8:01 ` Richard Guenther
2012-03-26 8:18 ` Eric Botcazou
2012-03-26 8:34 ` Richard Guenther
2012-03-26 17:54 ` Eric Botcazou
2012-03-27 6:51 ` Richard Guenther
2012-03-27 7:08 ` Eric Botcazou
2012-03-27 7:50 ` Richard Guenther
2012-03-27 8:39 ` Eric Botcazou [this message]
2012-03-27 8:47 ` Richard Guenther
2012-03-30 20:58 ` Eric Botcazou
2012-04-02 14:23 ` Richard Guenther
2012-04-03 8:26 ` Eric Botcazou
2012-04-03 8:34 ` Richard Guenther
2012-04-03 11:09 ` Eric Botcazou
2012-04-03 11:44 ` Richard Guenther
2012-03-26 8:10 ` Eric Botcazou
2012-03-26 8:52 ` Richard Guenther
2012-03-26 18:04 ` Eric Botcazou
2012-03-27 6:51 ` Richard Guenther
2012-03-26 7:18 ` Eric Botcazou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201203271038.32329.ebotcazou@adacore.com \
--to=ebotcazou@adacore.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).