From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30409 invoked by alias); 1 Jun 2012 17:48:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 30401 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jun 2012 17:48:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 17:48:43 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9742290026; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 19:48:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W7BwwKqpSZst; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 19:48:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (bon31-6-88-161-99-133.fbx.proxad.net [88.161.99.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C8529000C; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 19:48:48 +0200 (CEST) From: Eric Botcazou To: Igor Zamyatin Subject: Re: [PATCH] Atom: Scheduler improvements for better imul placement Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 17:48:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Uros Bizjak References: <0EFAB2BDD0F67E4FB6CCC8B9F87D756915E05C45@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201206011946.15316.ebotcazou@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00081.txt.bz2 > Sorry, I didn't realize that patch was missed. I attached new version. > > Changelog: > > 2012-05-29 Yuri Rumyantsev > > * config/i386/i386.c (x86_sched_reorder): New function. > Added new function x86_sched_reorder. Reading it, you get the impression that the new function is unused. Replace the second line with the description of the second hunk. -- Eric Botcazou