From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2038 invoked by alias); 1 Aug 2012 22:02:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 2029 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Aug 2012 22:02:41 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 22:02:29 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q71M2TBv014393 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 18:02:29 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (ovpn-113-78.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.78]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q71M2Rg0018482 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 1 Aug 2012 18:02:28 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (greed.delorie.com [127.0.0.1]) by greed.delorie.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q71M2RI3003635; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 18:02:27 -0400 Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id q71M2Rs0003634; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 18:02:27 -0400 Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 22:02:00 -0000 Message-Id: <201208012202.q71M2Rs0003634@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: Richard Henderson CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org In-reply-to: <1343853361-21574-2-git-send-email-rth@redhat.com> (message from Richard Henderson on Wed, 1 Aug 2012 13:36:01 -0700) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Allow MODE_PARTIAL_INT in expmed costs References: <1343853361-21574-2-git-send-email-rth@redhat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00061.txt.bz2 > Testing on m32c reveals that we've been asking for cost of > conversion from MODE_PARTIAL_INT. We hadn't actually been > initializing those costs, mind. Ah, ignore my previous email in the m32c thread then ;-)