public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
	Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford@googlemail.com>,
	       Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2, rtl-optimization]: Fix PR54457, [x32] Fail to combine 64bit index + constant
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:33:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120927182008.GZ1787@tucnak.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFULd4YiqSJPDNzg3XTyWx=mBphzCWSpuaQiQ7SbO17Bgc7SSA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 08:04:58PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> After some off-line discussion with Richard, attached is v2 of the patch.
> 
> 2012-09-27  Uros Bizjak  <ubizjak@gmail.com>
> 
>         PR rtl-optimization/54457
>         * simplify-rtx.c (simplify_subreg):
> 	Simplify (subreg:SI (op:DI ((x:DI) (y:DI)), 0)
>      	to (op:SI (subreg:SI (x:DI) 0) (subreg:SI (x:DI) 0)).

Is that a good idea even for WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS targets?

> --- simplify-rtx.c	(revision 191808)
> +++ simplify-rtx.c	(working copy)
> @@ -5689,6 +5689,28 @@ simplify_subreg (enum machine_mode outermode, rtx
>  	return CONST0_RTX (outermode);
>      }
>  
> +  /* Simplify (subreg:SI (op:DI ((x:DI) (y:DI)), 0)
> +     to (op:SI (subreg:SI (x:DI) 0) (subreg:SI (x:DI) 0)), where
> +     the outer subreg is effectively a truncation to the original mode.  */
> +  if ((GET_CODE (op) == PLUS
> +       || GET_CODE (op) == MINUS
> +       || GET_CODE (op) == MULT)
> +      && SCALAR_INT_MODE_P (outermode)
> +      && SCALAR_INT_MODE_P (innermode)
> +      && GET_MODE_PRECISION (outermode) < GET_MODE_PRECISION (innermode)
> +      && byte == subreg_lowpart_offset (outermode, innermode))
> +    {
> +      rtx op0 = simplify_gen_subreg (outermode, XEXP (op, 0),
> +                                     innermode, byte);
> +      if (op0)
> +        {
> +          rtx op1 = simplify_gen_subreg (outermode, XEXP (op, 1),
> +                                         innermode, byte);
> +          if (op1)
> +            return simplify_gen_binary (GET_CODE (op), outermode, op0, op1);
> +        }
> +    }
> +
>    /* Simplify (subreg:QI (lshiftrt:SI (sign_extend:SI (x:QI)) C), 0) into
>       to (ashiftrt:QI (x:QI) C), where C is a suitable small constant and
>       the outer subreg is effectively a truncation to the original mode.  */

	Jakub

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-09-27 18:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-25  8:04 [PATCH, " Uros Bizjak
2012-09-26 18:17 ` Richard Sandiford
2012-09-26 21:38   ` Eric Botcazou
2012-09-27 14:25     ` Uros Bizjak
2012-09-27 16:10       ` Richard Sandiford
2012-09-27 18:20         ` [PATCH v2, " Uros Bizjak
2012-09-27 18:35           ` Paul_Koning
2012-09-27 19:21             ` Uros Bizjak
2012-10-02  2:13               ` Andrew Pinski
2012-10-02 19:32                 ` Richard Sandiford
2012-10-06 10:22                   ` RFA: Simplifying truncation and integer lowpart subregs Richard Sandiford
2012-10-06 11:13                     ` Eric Botcazou
2012-10-06 12:39                       ` Richard Sandiford
2012-10-06 13:05                         ` Eric Botcazou
2012-10-07  8:56                           ` Richard Sandiford
2012-10-07 12:36                             ` Eric Botcazou
2012-11-28  2:27                             ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2012-11-28 21:45                               ` Richard Sandiford
2012-09-27 20:33           ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2012-09-27 22:37             ` [PATCH v2, rtl-optimization]: Fix PR54457, [x32] Fail to combine 64bit index + constant Richard Sandiford
2012-09-28 15:39             ` Uros Bizjak
2012-09-30 11:40               ` Richard Sandiford
2012-10-03 11:07                 ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120927182008.GZ1787@tucnak.redhat.com \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebotcazou@adacore.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=rdsandiford@googlemail.com \
    --cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).